Total babies named Magnolia (all years): 21,154
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 2,146 / #138 / 0.133% |
| 2023 | 1,951 / #144 / 0.122% |
| 2022 | 1,884 / #151 / 0.115% |
| 2021 | 1,965 / #140 / 0.120% |
| 2020 | 1,622 / #176 / 0.100% |
| 2019 | 1,322 / #237 / 0.079% |
| 2018 | 1,048 / #314 / 0.062% |
| 2017 | 815 / #384 / 0.047% |
| 2016 | 618 / #507 / 0.035% |
| 2015 | 450 / #635 / 0.025% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 336 / #826 / 0.019% |
| 2013 | 259 / #972 / 0.015% |
| 2012 | 221 / #1123 / 0.013% |
| 2011 | 192 / #1247 / 0.011% |
| 2010 | 166 / #1390 / 0.009% |
| 2009 | 141 / #1600 / 0.008% |
| 2008 | 141 / #1613 / 0.007% |
| 2007 | 116 / #1835 / 0.006% |
| 2006 | 100 / #1998 / 0.005% |
| 2005 | 74 / #2396 / 0.004% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 66 / #2543 / 0.004% |
| 2003 | 58 / #2728 / 0.003% |
| 2002 | 66 / #2436 / 0.004% |
| 2001 | 75 / #2181 / 0.004% |
| 2000 | 72 / #2203 / 0.004% |
| 1999 | 33 / #3685 / 0.002% |
| 1998 | 38 / #3268 / 0.002% |
| 1997 | 30 / #3772 / 0.002% |
| 1996 | 34 / #3401 / 0.002% |
| 1995 | 25 / #4172 / 0.001% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 29 / #3750 / 0.002% |
| 1993 | 28 / #3839 / 0.002% |
| 1992 | 19 / #5181 / 0.001% |
| 1991 | 20 / #4923 / 0.001% |
| 1990 | 15 / #6007 / 0.001% |
| 1989 | 15 / #5718 / 0.001% |
| 1988 | 10 / #7469 / 0.001% |
| 1986 | 18 / #4462 / 0.001% |
| 1985 | 7 / #8881 / 0.000% |
| 1984 | 16 / #4639 / 0.001% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1983 | 12 / #5666 / 0.001% |
| 1982 | 22 / #3715 / 0.001% |
| 1981 | 14 / #5128 / 0.001% |
| 1980 | 17 / #4437 / 0.001% |
| 1979 | 14 / #4985 / 0.001% |
| 1978 | 24 / #3246 / 0.002% |
| 1977 | 17 / #4161 / 0.001% |
| 1976 | 14 / #4495 / 0.001% |
| 1975 | 17 / #3873 / 0.001% |
| 1974 | 11 / #5199 / 0.001% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1973 | 22 / #3079 / 0.002% |
| 1972 | 13 / #4432 / 0.001% |
| 1971 | 9 / #5815 / 0.001% |
| 1970 | 8 / #6123 / 0.000% |
| 1969 | 10 / #4903 / 0.001% |
| 1968 | 11 / #4380 / 0.001% |
| 1967 | 15 / #3425 / 0.001% |
| 1966 | 11 / #4101 / 0.001% |
| 1965 | 19 / #2885 / 0.001% |
| 1964 | 19 / #2974 / 0.001% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1963 | 19 / #2922 / 0.001% |
| 1962 | 18 / #2990 / 0.001% |
| 1961 | 19 / #2910 / 0.001% |
| 1960 | 12 / #3831 / 0.001% |
| 1959 | 10 / #4194 / 0.000% |
| 1958 | 25 / #2289 / 0.001% |
| 1957 | 24 / #2323 / 0.001% |
| 1956 | 29 / #2031 / 0.001% |
| 1955 | 27 / #2088 / 0.001% |
| 1954 | 25 / #2164 / 0.001% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1953 | 47 / #1434 / 0.003% |
| 1952 | 31 / #1808 / 0.002% |
| 1951 | 42 / #1458 / 0.002% |
| 1950 | 43 / #1401 / 0.003% |
| 1949 | 43 / #1417 / 0.003% |
| 1948 | 45 / #1379 / 0.003% |
| 1947 | 47 / #1351 / 0.003% |
| 1946 | 51 / #1215 / 0.003% |
| 1945 | 48 / #1137 / 0.004% |
| 1944 | 43 / #1216 / 0.003% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1943 | 45 / #1209 / 0.003% |
| 1942 | 53 / #1084 / 0.004% |
| 1941 | 47 / #1078 / 0.004% |
| 1940 | 77 / #815 / 0.007% |
| 1939 | 48 / #1031 / 0.004% |
| 1938 | 56 / #953 / 0.005% |
| 1937 | 51 / #985 / 0.005% |
| 1936 | 57 / #906 / 0.005% |
| 1935 | 81 / #756 / 0.008% |
| 1934 | 53 / #950 / 0.005% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1933 | 85 / #707 / 0.008% |
| 1932 | 77 / #772 / 0.007% |
| 1931 | 69 / #827 / 0.006% |
| 1930 | 94 / #721 / 0.008% |
| 1929 | 76 / #812 / 0.007% |
| 1928 | 100 / #707 / 0.009% |
| 1927 | 117 / #668 / 0.010% |
| 1926 | 87 / #775 / 0.007% |
| 1925 | 125 / #659 / 0.010% |
| 1924 | 121 / #678 / 0.010% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1923 | 127 / #658 / 0.011% |
| 1922 | 150 / #586 / 0.012% |
| 1921 | 151 / #589 / 0.012% |
| 1920 | 127 / #642 / 0.011% |
| 1919 | 136 / #605 / 0.012% |
| 1918 | 146 / #591 / 0.013% |
| 1917 | 102 / #681 / 0.009% |
| 1916 | 131 / #588 / 0.013% |
| 1915 | 120 / #596 / 0.012% |
| 1914 | 115 / #523 / 0.015% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1913 | 89 / #539 / 0.014% |
| 1912 | 104 / #469 / 0.019% |
| 1911 | 73 / #485 / 0.017% |
| 1910 | 85 / #433 / 0.021% |
| 1909 | 77 / #420 / 0.022% |
| 1908 | 73 / #424 / 0.022% |
| 1907 | 41 / #578 / 0.013% |
| 1906 | 43 / #534 / 0.015% |
| 1905 | 47 / #493 / 0.016% |
| 1904 | 42 / #510 / 0.015% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1903 | 46 / #474 / 0.018% |
| 1902 | 48 / #457 / 0.018% |
| 1901 | 19 / #759 / 0.008% |
| 1900 | 43 / #517 / 0.014% |
| 1899 | 21 / #693 / 0.009% |
| 1898 | 25 / #660 / 0.010% |
| 1897 | 28 / #578 / 0.012% |
| 1896 | 25 / #627 / 0.011% |
| 1895 | 31 / #535 / 0.013% |
| 1894 | 16 / #770 / 0.007% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1893 | 23 / #609 / 0.011% |
| 1892 | 14 / #820 / 0.007% |
| 1891 | 15 / #715 / 0.008% |
| 1890 | 9 / #982 / 0.005% |
| 1889 | 17 / #631 / 0.010% |
| 1888 | 14 / #708 / 0.008% |
| 1887 | 10 / #773 / 0.007% |
| 1886 | 15 / #595 / 0.010% |
| 1885 | 6 / #1002 / 0.005% |
| 1884 | 8 / #829 / 0.006% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1883 | 8 / #734 / 0.007% |
| 1882 | 7 / #783 / 0.006% |
| 1881 | 12 / #495 / 0.013% |
| 1880 | 8 / #658 / 0.009% |