Total babies named Malcolm (all years): 69,060
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 1,088 / #314 / 0.063% |
| 2023 | 1,131 / #293 / 0.066% |
| 2022 | 1,219 / #284 / 0.070% |
| 2021 | 1,228 / #281 / 0.070% |
| 2020 | 1,170 / #291 / 0.068% |
| 2019 | 1,022 / #327 / 0.057% |
| 2018 | 804 / #394 / 0.044% |
| 2017 | 814 / #392 / 0.044% |
| 2016 | 784 / #408 / 0.041% |
| 2015 | 741 / #421 / 0.039% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 682 / #442 / 0.036% |
| 2013 | 649 / #442 / 0.034% |
| 2012 | 585 / #467 / 0.031% |
| 2011 | 524 / #497 / 0.028% |
| 2010 | 496 / #521 / 0.026% |
| 2009 | 432 / #599 / 0.022% |
| 2008 | 482 / #545 / 0.024% |
| 2007 | 453 / #568 / 0.022% |
| 2006 | 468 / #541 / 0.023% |
| 2005 | 448 / #540 / 0.022% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 444 / #533 / 0.022% |
| 2003 | 507 / #487 / 0.026% |
| 2002 | 582 / #427 / 0.030% |
| 2001 | 614 / #409 / 0.032% |
| 2000 | 715 / #368 / 0.036% |
| 1999 | 712 / #366 / 0.037% |
| 1998 | 702 / #366 / 0.037% |
| 1997 | 766 / #338 / 0.041% |
| 1996 | 841 / #313 / 0.044% |
| 1995 | 887 / #301 / 0.047% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 979 / #277 / 0.051% |
| 1993 | 1,224 / #237 / 0.062% |
| 1992 | 1,495 / #206 / 0.075% |
| 1991 | 1,299 / #230 / 0.064% |
| 1990 | 1,158 / #241 / 0.056% |
| 1989 | 905 / #274 / 0.045% |
| 1988 | 740 / #308 / 0.039% |
| 1987 | 633 / #324 / 0.034% |
| 1986 | 528 / #359 / 0.029% |
| 1985 | 386 / #434 / 0.021% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 279 / #505 / 0.015% |
| 1983 | 222 / #567 / 0.012% |
| 1982 | 300 / #491 / 0.017% |
| 1981 | 275 / #509 / 0.015% |
| 1980 | 261 / #534 / 0.015% |
| 1979 | 290 / #487 / 0.017% |
| 1978 | 296 / #470 / 0.018% |
| 1977 | 326 / #440 / 0.020% |
| 1976 | 338 / #423 / 0.022% |
| 1975 | 367 / #401 / 0.024% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 337 / #428 / 0.021% |
| 1973 | 390 / #392 / 0.025% |
| 1972 | 450 / #371 / 0.028% |
| 1971 | 518 / #354 / 0.029% |
| 1970 | 537 / #349 / 0.029% |
| 1969 | 441 / #373 / 0.025% |
| 1968 | 421 / #380 / 0.024% |
| 1967 | 430 / #362 / 0.025% |
| 1966 | 453 / #354 / 0.025% |
| 1965 | 614 / #305 / 0.033% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 472 / #360 / 0.024% |
| 1963 | 485 / #354 / 0.024% |
| 1962 | 520 / #342 / 0.025% |
| 1961 | 525 / #345 / 0.025% |
| 1960 | 545 / #332 / 0.026% |
| 1959 | 501 / #348 / 0.023% |
| 1958 | 603 / #308 / 0.028% |
| 1957 | 562 / #326 / 0.026% |
| 1956 | 569 / #311 / 0.027% |
| 1955 | 593 / #296 / 0.029% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 597 / #291 / 0.029% |
| 1953 | 546 / #302 / 0.028% |
| 1952 | 602 / #282 / 0.031% |
| 1951 | 588 / #282 / 0.031% |
| 1950 | 540 / #290 / 0.030% |
| 1949 | 520 / #295 / 0.029% |
| 1948 | 549 / #290 / 0.031% |
| 1947 | 630 / #269 / 0.034% |
| 1946 | 626 / #248 / 0.039% |
| 1945 | 511 / #255 / 0.038% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 549 / #245 / 0.040% |
| 1943 | 673 / #216 / 0.047% |
| 1942 | 577 / #234 / 0.042% |
| 1941 | 497 / #249 / 0.040% |
| 1940 | 548 / #226 / 0.047% |
| 1939 | 522 / #227 / 0.047% |
| 1938 | 542 / #222 / 0.049% |
| 1937 | 502 / #236 / 0.047% |
| 1936 | 531 / #219 / 0.051% |
| 1935 | 545 / #221 / 0.052% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 499 / #231 / 0.048% |
| 1933 | 525 / #219 / 0.053% |
| 1932 | 572 / #215 / 0.055% |
| 1931 | 584 / #214 / 0.056% |
| 1930 | 558 / #229 / 0.051% |
| 1929 | 597 / #213 / 0.056% |
| 1928 | 666 / #205 / 0.060% |
| 1927 | 613 / #217 / 0.054% |
| 1926 | 629 / #217 / 0.057% |
| 1925 | 618 / #218 / 0.055% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 639 / #210 / 0.056% |
| 1923 | 623 / #207 / 0.057% |
| 1922 | 548 / #240 / 0.050% |
| 1921 | 599 / #224 / 0.054% |
| 1920 | 556 / #227 / 0.052% |
| 1919 | 499 / #236 / 0.051% |
| 1918 | 508 / #236 / 0.050% |
| 1917 | 544 / #206 / 0.059% |
| 1916 | 476 / #225 / 0.053% |
| 1915 | 464 / #221 / 0.055% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 317 / #240 / 0.048% |
| 1913 | 288 / #220 / 0.056% |
| 1912 | 233 / #225 / 0.054% |
| 1911 | 140 / #210 / 0.062% |
| 1910 | 86 / #265 / 0.044% |
| 1909 | 83 / #242 / 0.051% |
| 1908 | 78 / #241 / 0.051% |
| 1907 | 54 / #289 / 0.037% |
| 1906 | 48 / #294 / 0.036% |
| 1905 | 65 / #244 / 0.049% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 46 / #282 / 0.036% |
| 1903 | 48 / #266 / 0.040% |
| 1902 | 52 / #258 / 0.042% |
| 1901 | 35 / #300 / 0.033% |
| 1900 | 55 / #279 / 0.037% |
| 1899 | 35 / #297 / 0.033% |
| 1898 | 40 / #293 / 0.033% |
| 1897 | 30 / #345 / 0.027% |
| 1896 | 48 / #261 / 0.040% |
| 1895 | 33 / #322 / 0.028% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 34 / #303 / 0.029% |
| 1893 | 27 / #343 / 0.024% |
| 1892 | 30 / #344 / 0.025% |
| 1891 | 31 / #303 / 0.031% |
| 1890 | 27 / #341 / 0.024% |
| 1889 | 27 / #344 / 0.024% |
| 1888 | 26 / #366 / 0.022% |
| 1887 | 21 / #364 / 0.021% |
| 1886 | 25 / #345 / 0.023% |
| 1885 | 14 / #516 / 0.013% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 18 / #442 / 0.016% |
| 1883 | 23 / #348 / 0.022% |
| 1882 | 20 / #410 / 0.018% |
| 1881 | 17 / #426 / 0.017% |
| 1880 | 18 / #417 / 0.016% |