Total babies named Marshall (all years): 97,616
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 830 / #391 / 0.048% |
| 2023 | 819 / #388 / 0.048% |
| 2022 | 840 / #384 / 0.048% |
| 2021 | 858 / #379 / 0.049% |
| 2020 | 851 / #366 / 0.049% |
| 2019 | 873 / #366 / 0.049% |
| 2018 | 943 / #350 / 0.052% |
| 2017 | 938 / #357 / 0.051% |
| 2016 | 1,010 / #345 / 0.053% |
| 2015 | 1,102 / #319 / 0.058% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 1,086 / #319 / 0.057% |
| 2013 | 994 / #328 / 0.053% |
| 2012 | 888 / #347 / 0.047% |
| 2011 | 894 / #338 / 0.047% |
| 2010 | 770 / #374 / 0.040% |
| 2009 | 735 / #402 / 0.037% |
| 2008 | 772 / #391 / 0.038% |
| 2007 | 712 / #409 / 0.034% |
| 2006 | 690 / #417 / 0.034% |
| 2005 | 640 / #419 / 0.032% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 741 / #376 / 0.037% |
| 2003 | 799 / #348 / 0.040% |
| 2002 | 717 / #367 / 0.037% |
| 2001 | 786 / #347 / 0.040% |
| 2000 | 796 / #344 / 0.041% |
| 1999 | 738 / #353 / 0.038% |
| 1998 | 740 / #353 / 0.039% |
| 1997 | 738 / #349 / 0.039% |
| 1996 | 855 / #310 / 0.045% |
| 1995 | 825 / #317 / 0.043% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 833 / #315 / 0.043% |
| 1993 | 883 / #308 / 0.045% |
| 1992 | 881 / #304 / 0.044% |
| 1991 | 850 / #301 / 0.042% |
| 1990 | 928 / #281 / 0.045% |
| 1989 | 847 / #289 / 0.042% |
| 1988 | 842 / #275 / 0.044% |
| 1987 | 727 / #296 / 0.039% |
| 1986 | 744 / #283 / 0.040% |
| 1985 | 717 / #285 / 0.039% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 792 / #265 / 0.044% |
| 1983 | 834 / #251 / 0.047% |
| 1982 | 817 / #264 / 0.045% |
| 1981 | 824 / #261 / 0.046% |
| 1980 | 825 / #263 / 0.046% |
| 1979 | 758 / #273 / 0.044% |
| 1978 | 718 / #272 / 0.044% |
| 1977 | 686 / #283 / 0.042% |
| 1976 | 651 / #288 / 0.041% |
| 1975 | 621 / #302 / 0.040% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 648 / #289 / 0.041% |
| 1973 | 619 / #294 / 0.040% |
| 1972 | 645 / #287 / 0.040% |
| 1971 | 675 / #295 / 0.038% |
| 1970 | 750 / #283 / 0.040% |
| 1969 | 722 / #276 / 0.040% |
| 1968 | 706 / #278 / 0.041% |
| 1967 | 675 / #277 / 0.039% |
| 1966 | 660 / #291 / 0.037% |
| 1965 | 779 / #265 / 0.042% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 831 / #267 / 0.042% |
| 1963 | 779 / #277 / 0.038% |
| 1962 | 839 / #263 / 0.041% |
| 1961 | 899 / #261 / 0.042% |
| 1960 | 891 / #268 / 0.042% |
| 1959 | 945 / #260 / 0.044% |
| 1958 | 1,038 / #241 / 0.049% |
| 1957 | 1,097 / #228 / 0.051% |
| 1956 | 1,114 / #219 / 0.053% |
| 1955 | 1,106 / #215 / 0.054% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 1,102 / #210 / 0.054% |
| 1953 | 1,037 / #211 / 0.053% |
| 1952 | 1,087 / #202 / 0.056% |
| 1951 | 1,080 / #197 / 0.057% |
| 1950 | 1,082 / #194 / 0.060% |
| 1949 | 1,111 / #187 / 0.063% |
| 1948 | 1,158 / #181 / 0.066% |
| 1947 | 1,269 / #174 / 0.069% |
| 1946 | 1,077 / #175 / 0.066% |
| 1945 | 969 / #170 / 0.072% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 1,007 / #169 / 0.074% |
| 1943 | 1,020 / #172 / 0.071% |
| 1942 | 952 / #173 / 0.069% |
| 1941 | 869 / #175 / 0.071% |
| 1940 | 809 / #181 / 0.070% |
| 1939 | 782 / #182 / 0.071% |
| 1938 | 819 / #180 / 0.074% |
| 1937 | 804 / #177 / 0.075% |
| 1936 | 711 / #184 / 0.069% |
| 1935 | 661 / #193 / 0.063% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 676 / #188 / 0.065% |
| 1933 | 674 / #182 / 0.068% |
| 1932 | 639 / #200 / 0.061% |
| 1931 | 667 / #196 / 0.064% |
| 1930 | 741 / #188 / 0.068% |
| 1929 | 694 / #197 / 0.065% |
| 1928 | 727 / #195 / 0.066% |
| 1927 | 787 / #184 / 0.070% |
| 1926 | 765 / #190 / 0.069% |
| 1925 | 830 / #176 / 0.074% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 856 / #169 / 0.076% |
| 1923 | 781 / #178 / 0.071% |
| 1922 | 854 / #171 / 0.078% |
| 1921 | 896 / #164 / 0.081% |
| 1920 | 850 / #162 / 0.080% |
| 1919 | 817 / #165 / 0.083% |
| 1918 | 878 / #156 / 0.087% |
| 1917 | 777 / #161 / 0.084% |
| 1916 | 739 / #163 / 0.083% |
| 1915 | 715 / #161 / 0.084% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 533 / #167 / 0.081% |
| 1913 | 426 / #164 / 0.083% |
| 1912 | 397 / #151 / 0.092% |
| 1911 | 178 / #177 / 0.079% |
| 1910 | 125 / #206 / 0.064% |
| 1909 | 134 / #177 / 0.082% |
| 1908 | 160 / #148 / 0.104% |
| 1907 | 118 / #184 / 0.080% |
| 1906 | 107 / #170 / 0.080% |
| 1905 | 119 / #166 / 0.090% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 116 / #163 / 0.091% |
| 1903 | 94 / #174 / 0.079% |
| 1902 | 94 / #180 / 0.077% |
| 1901 | 67 / #209 / 0.063% |
| 1900 | 126 / #167 / 0.084% |
| 1899 | 70 / #195 / 0.066% |
| 1898 | 109 / #157 / 0.089% |
| 1897 | 82 / #188 / 0.073% |
| 1896 | 118 / #142 / 0.099% |
| 1895 | 100 / #157 / 0.085% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 93 / #167 / 0.080% |
| 1893 | 98 / #152 / 0.087% |
| 1892 | 93 / #172 / 0.076% |
| 1891 | 80 / #162 / 0.079% |
| 1890 | 73 / #184 / 0.066% |
| 1889 | 77 / #174 / 0.070% |
| 1888 | 91 / #165 / 0.075% |
| 1887 | 69 / #182 / 0.068% |
| 1886 | 105 / #132 / 0.095% |
| 1885 | 78 / #171 / 0.072% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 88 / #159 / 0.077% |
| 1883 | 79 / #160 / 0.076% |
| 1882 | 83 / #163 / 0.073% |
| 1881 | 56 / #203 / 0.056% |
| 1880 | 78 / #168 / 0.071% |