Total babies named Marvin (all years): 255,401
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 406 / #671 / 0.024% |
| 2023 | 432 / #638 / 0.025% |
| 2022 | 457 / #612 / 0.026% |
| 2021 | 450 / #619 / 0.026% |
| 2020 | 451 / #606 / 0.026% |
| 2019 | 477 / #584 / 0.027% |
| 2018 | 480 / #577 / 0.026% |
| 2017 | 487 / #559 / 0.026% |
| 2016 | 533 / #542 / 0.028% |
| 2015 | 522 / #548 / 0.027% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 571 / #493 / 0.030% |
| 2013 | 550 / #498 / 0.029% |
| 2012 | 581 / #471 / 0.031% |
| 2011 | 577 / #466 / 0.030% |
| 2010 | 636 / #431 / 0.033% |
| 2009 | 710 / #415 / 0.036% |
| 2008 | 827 / #372 / 0.041% |
| 2007 | 887 / #356 / 0.043% |
| 2006 | 896 / #344 / 0.044% |
| 2005 | 809 / #365 / 0.041% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 802 / #352 / 0.040% |
| 2003 | 870 / #333 / 0.044% |
| 2002 | 802 / #341 / 0.041% |
| 2001 | 809 / #341 / 0.042% |
| 2000 | 815 / #336 / 0.042% |
| 1999 | 765 / #348 / 0.040% |
| 1998 | 840 / #323 / 0.044% |
| 1997 | 858 / #311 / 0.046% |
| 1996 | 871 / #303 / 0.046% |
| 1995 | 843 / #314 / 0.044% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 978 / #278 / 0.051% |
| 1993 | 1,081 / #267 / 0.055% |
| 1992 | 1,175 / #244 / 0.059% |
| 1991 | 1,193 / #237 / 0.059% |
| 1990 | 1,216 / #237 / 0.059% |
| 1989 | 1,191 / #227 / 0.060% |
| 1988 | 1,152 / #221 / 0.060% |
| 1987 | 1,079 / #221 / 0.058% |
| 1986 | 1,137 / #212 / 0.062% |
| 1985 | 1,143 / #212 / 0.062% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 1,100 / #210 / 0.061% |
| 1983 | 1,172 / #202 / 0.065% |
| 1982 | 1,135 / #214 / 0.063% |
| 1981 | 1,171 / #212 / 0.065% |
| 1980 | 1,224 / #200 / 0.069% |
| 1979 | 1,245 / #196 / 0.072% |
| 1978 | 1,200 / #196 / 0.073% |
| 1977 | 1,172 / #196 / 0.071% |
| 1976 | 1,253 / #181 / 0.080% |
| 1975 | 1,309 / #177 / 0.084% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 1,486 / #163 / 0.095% |
| 1973 | 1,506 / #162 / 0.097% |
| 1972 | 1,594 / #163 / 0.098% |
| 1971 | 1,931 / #152 / 0.109% |
| 1970 | 2,036 / #153 / 0.110% |
| 1969 | 2,198 / #139 / 0.123% |
| 1968 | 2,255 / #129 / 0.130% |
| 1967 | 2,427 / #124 / 0.139% |
| 1966 | 2,735 / #113 / 0.153% |
| 1965 | 2,969 / #109 / 0.160% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 2,977 / #119 / 0.149% |
| 1963 | 2,975 / #120 / 0.146% |
| 1962 | 3,130 / #118 / 0.151% |
| 1961 | 3,185 / #120 / 0.150% |
| 1960 | 3,276 / #119 / 0.154% |
| 1959 | 3,168 / #123 / 0.148% |
| 1958 | 3,301 / #119 / 0.156% |
| 1957 | 3,408 / #112 / 0.158% |
| 1956 | 3,482 / #105 / 0.165% |
| 1955 | 3,660 / #94 / 0.178% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 3,498 / #97 / 0.172% |
| 1953 | 3,564 / #94 / 0.181% |
| 1952 | 3,575 / #95 / 0.184% |
| 1951 | 3,557 / #96 / 0.189% |
| 1950 | 3,493 / #93 / 0.195% |
| 1949 | 3,725 / #89 / 0.210% |
| 1948 | 3,625 / #90 / 0.207% |
| 1947 | 3,773 / #89 / 0.206% |
| 1946 | 3,600 / #88 / 0.222% |
| 1945 | 3,294 / #80 / 0.245% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 3,568 / #75 / 0.262% |
| 1943 | 3,939 / #66 / 0.276% |
| 1942 | 3,792 / #66 / 0.275% |
| 1941 | 3,626 / #63 / 0.295% |
| 1940 | 3,502 / #63 / 0.302% |
| 1939 | 3,758 / #52 / 0.340% |
| 1938 | 3,900 / #53 / 0.352% |
| 1937 | 3,912 / #49 / 0.367% |
| 1936 | 3,936 / #49 / 0.379% |
| 1935 | 4,278 / #45 / 0.411% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 4,217 / #44 / 0.408% |
| 1933 | 4,131 / #44 / 0.417% |
| 1932 | 4,188 / #46 / 0.401% |
| 1931 | 4,360 / #45 / 0.419% |
| 1930 | 4,403 / #48 / 0.401% |
| 1929 | 4,389 / #46 / 0.408% |
| 1928 | 4,452 / #46 / 0.402% |
| 1927 | 4,397 / #47 / 0.390% |
| 1926 | 4,111 / #50 / 0.370% |
| 1925 | 4,092 / #51 / 0.367% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 4,024 / #50 / 0.355% |
| 1923 | 3,810 / #51 / 0.348% |
| 1922 | 3,580 / #56 / 0.329% |
| 1921 | 3,490 / #59 / 0.317% |
| 1920 | 3,244 / #62 / 0.305% |
| 1919 | 2,997 / #63 / 0.306% |
| 1918 | 2,829 / #68 / 0.279% |
| 1917 | 2,517 / #68 / 0.272% |
| 1916 | 2,529 / #66 / 0.284% |
| 1915 | 2,227 / #72 / 0.262% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 1,627 / #75 / 0.248% |
| 1913 | 1,236 / #77 / 0.241% |
| 1912 | 958 / #83 / 0.223% |
| 1911 | 488 / #82 / 0.216% |
| 1910 | 413 / #84 / 0.213% |
| 1909 | 354 / #85 / 0.216% |
| 1908 | 311 / #87 / 0.202% |
| 1907 | 304 / #87 / 0.207% |
| 1906 | 245 / #94 / 0.184% |
| 1905 | 215 / #100 / 0.163% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 203 / #104 / 0.158% |
| 1903 | 185 / #106 / 0.155% |
| 1902 | 186 / #105 / 0.152% |
| 1901 | 145 / #117 / 0.136% |
| 1900 | 176 / #130 / 0.117% |
| 1899 | 138 / #121 / 0.130% |
| 1898 | 127 / #141 / 0.104% |
| 1897 | 134 / #122 / 0.119% |
| 1896 | 93 / #175 / 0.078% |
| 1895 | 107 / #144 / 0.091% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 92 / #168 / 0.079% |
| 1893 | 102 / #148 / 0.091% |
| 1892 | 88 / #180 / 0.072% |
| 1891 | 93 / #143 / 0.092% |
| 1890 | 99 / #143 / 0.089% |
| 1889 | 77 / #175 / 0.070% |
| 1888 | 90 / #167 / 0.074% |
| 1887 | 70 / #181 / 0.069% |
| 1886 | 90 / #155 / 0.081% |
| 1885 | 65 / #197 / 0.060% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 73 / #190 / 0.064% |
| 1883 | 71 / #174 / 0.068% |
| 1882 | 64 / #201 / 0.056% |
| 1881 | 57 / #200 / 0.057% |
| 1880 | 69 / #184 / 0.062% |