Total babies named Mathew (all years): 77,505
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 244 / #939 / 0.014% |
| 2023 | 259 / #897 / 0.015% |
| 2022 | 271 / #878 / 0.016% |
| 2021 | 315 / #783 / 0.018% |
| 2020 | 350 / #714 / 0.020% |
| 2019 | 389 / #670 / 0.022% |
| 2018 | 478 / #580 / 0.026% |
| 2017 | 503 / #553 / 0.027% |
| 2016 | 565 / #524 / 0.030% |
| 2015 | 628 / #477 / 0.033% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 625 / #466 / 0.033% |
| 2013 | 674 / #432 / 0.036% |
| 2012 | 656 / #427 / 0.035% |
| 2011 | 691 / #408 / 0.036% |
| 2010 | 700 / #402 / 0.036% |
| 2009 | 799 / #380 / 0.040% |
| 2008 | 832 / #370 / 0.041% |
| 2007 | 926 / #347 / 0.045% |
| 2006 | 1,011 / #317 / 0.049% |
| 2005 | 1,093 / #301 / 0.055% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 1,092 / #291 / 0.055% |
| 2003 | 1,125 / #279 / 0.057% |
| 2002 | 1,121 / #274 / 0.058% |
| 2001 | 1,272 / #259 / 0.065% |
| 2000 | 1,343 / #252 / 0.068% |
| 1999 | 1,471 / #227 / 0.077% |
| 1998 | 1,452 / #221 / 0.076% |
| 1997 | 1,432 / #215 / 0.076% |
| 1996 | 1,514 / #204 / 0.080% |
| 1995 | 1,600 / #192 / 0.084% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 1,634 / #187 / 0.085% |
| 1993 | 1,705 / #187 / 0.087% |
| 1992 | 1,833 / #174 / 0.092% |
| 1991 | 1,984 / #161 / 0.098% |
| 1990 | 2,174 / #148 / 0.106% |
| 1989 | 2,162 / #143 / 0.108% |
| 1988 | 2,061 / #142 / 0.108% |
| 1987 | 2,045 / #140 / 0.110% |
| 1986 | 1,967 / #141 / 0.107% |
| 1985 | 1,880 / #148 / 0.102% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 1,968 / #139 / 0.109% |
| 1983 | 1,866 / #146 / 0.104% |
| 1982 | 1,712 / #160 / 0.094% |
| 1981 | 1,627 / #165 / 0.091% |
| 1980 | 1,334 / #183 / 0.075% |
| 1979 | 1,256 / #192 / 0.073% |
| 1978 | 1,286 / #182 / 0.078% |
| 1977 | 1,240 / #191 / 0.075% |
| 1976 | 1,162 / #192 / 0.074% |
| 1975 | 1,126 / #197 / 0.072% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 1,084 / #204 / 0.069% |
| 1973 | 1,027 / #213 / 0.066% |
| 1972 | 905 / #237 / 0.056% |
| 1971 | 935 / #244 / 0.053% |
| 1970 | 828 / #265 / 0.045% |
| 1969 | 656 / #297 / 0.037% |
| 1968 | 617 / #302 / 0.036% |
| 1967 | 594 / #301 / 0.034% |
| 1966 | 476 / #342 / 0.027% |
| 1965 | 443 / #367 / 0.024% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 448 / #371 / 0.022% |
| 1963 | 412 / #394 / 0.020% |
| 1962 | 325 / #442 / 0.016% |
| 1961 | 347 / #427 / 0.016% |
| 1960 | 336 / #439 / 0.016% |
| 1959 | 359 / #417 / 0.017% |
| 1958 | 348 / #421 / 0.016% |
| 1957 | 251 / #494 / 0.012% |
| 1956 | 230 / #500 / 0.011% |
| 1955 | 175 / #557 / 0.009% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 183 / #538 / 0.009% |
| 1953 | 161 / #560 / 0.008% |
| 1952 | 140 / #593 / 0.007% |
| 1951 | 124 / #633 / 0.007% |
| 1950 | 88 / #734 / 0.005% |
| 1949 | 116 / #636 / 0.007% |
| 1948 | 82 / #748 / 0.005% |
| 1947 | 93 / #713 / 0.005% |
| 1946 | 78 / #749 / 0.005% |
| 1945 | 90 / #638 / 0.007% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 76 / #715 / 0.006% |
| 1943 | 82 / #712 / 0.006% |
| 1942 | 78 / #730 / 0.006% |
| 1941 | 82 / #677 / 0.007% |
| 1940 | 89 / #633 / 0.008% |
| 1939 | 66 / #742 / 0.006% |
| 1938 | 78 / #688 / 0.007% |
| 1937 | 75 / #694 / 0.007% |
| 1936 | 83 / #634 / 0.008% |
| 1935 | 90 / #621 / 0.009% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 91 / #633 / 0.009% |
| 1933 | 89 / #616 / 0.009% |
| 1932 | 101 / #589 / 0.010% |
| 1931 | 97 / #600 / 0.009% |
| 1930 | 120 / #551 / 0.011% |
| 1929 | 136 / #505 / 0.013% |
| 1928 | 154 / #490 / 0.014% |
| 1927 | 147 / #500 / 0.013% |
| 1926 | 167 / #466 / 0.015% |
| 1925 | 163 / #476 / 0.015% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 192 / #442 / 0.017% |
| 1923 | 178 / #459 / 0.016% |
| 1922 | 203 / #421 / 0.019% |
| 1921 | 192 / #444 / 0.017% |
| 1920 | 207 / #411 / 0.019% |
| 1919 | 247 / #368 / 0.025% |
| 1918 | 206 / #409 / 0.020% |
| 1917 | 208 / #389 / 0.022% |
| 1916 | 217 / #373 / 0.024% |
| 1915 | 204 / #376 / 0.024% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 143 / #399 / 0.022% |
| 1913 | 140 / #350 / 0.027% |
| 1912 | 121 / #344 / 0.028% |
| 1911 | 45 / #437 / 0.020% |
| 1910 | 53 / #349 / 0.027% |
| 1909 | 42 / #367 / 0.026% |
| 1908 | 33 / #418 / 0.021% |
| 1907 | 54 / #290 / 0.037% |
| 1906 | 21 / #498 / 0.016% |
| 1905 | 36 / #343 / 0.027% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 29 / #385 / 0.023% |
| 1903 | 34 / #326 / 0.029% |
| 1902 | 40 / #306 / 0.033% |
| 1901 | 39 / #276 / 0.037% |
| 1900 | 57 / #272 / 0.038% |
| 1899 | 39 / #279 / 0.037% |
| 1898 | 42 / #284 / 0.034% |
| 1897 | 50 / #248 / 0.044% |
| 1896 | 40 / #292 / 0.033% |
| 1895 | 33 / #323 / 0.028% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 30 / #328 / 0.026% |
| 1893 | 39 / #282 / 0.035% |
| 1892 | 55 / #240 / 0.045% |
| 1891 | 44 / #240 / 0.043% |
| 1890 | 43 / #266 / 0.039% |
| 1889 | 42 / #257 / 0.038% |
| 1888 | 67 / #216 / 0.055% |
| 1887 | 31 / #304 / 0.031% |
| 1886 | 48 / #250 / 0.043% |
| 1885 | 34 / #288 / 0.032% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 53 / #233 / 0.046% |
| 1883 | 37 / #274 / 0.035% |
| 1882 | 47 / #247 / 0.041% |
| 1881 | 55 / #206 / 0.055% |
| 1880 | 60 / #204 / 0.054% |