Total babies named Mike (all years): 206,369
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 221 / #1011 / 0.013% |
| 2023 | 206 / #1056 / 0.012% |
| 2022 | 211 / #1047 / 0.012% |
| 2021 | 161 / #1203 / 0.009% |
| 2020 | 168 / #1155 / 0.010% |
| 2019 | 176 / #1115 / 0.010% |
| 2018 | 171 / #1132 / 0.009% |
| 2017 | 219 / #952 / 0.012% |
| 2016 | 190 / #1043 / 0.010% |
| 2015 | 196 / #1034 / 0.010% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 216 / #972 / 0.011% |
| 2013 | 236 / #883 / 0.012% |
| 2012 | 245 / #861 / 0.013% |
| 2011 | 239 / #876 / 0.013% |
| 2010 | 242 / #870 / 0.013% |
| 2009 | 260 / #833 / 0.013% |
| 2008 | 293 / #760 / 0.014% |
| 2007 | 292 / #754 / 0.014% |
| 2006 | 329 / #686 / 0.016% |
| 2005 | 300 / #690 / 0.015% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 338 / #624 / 0.017% |
| 2003 | 322 / #640 / 0.016% |
| 2002 | 342 / #597 / 0.018% |
| 2001 | 315 / #614 / 0.016% |
| 2000 | 329 / #601 / 0.017% |
| 1999 | 284 / #632 / 0.015% |
| 1998 | 290 / #627 / 0.015% |
| 1997 | 335 / #564 / 0.018% |
| 1996 | 362 / #534 / 0.019% |
| 1995 | 332 / #563 / 0.017% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 288 / #616 / 0.015% |
| 1993 | 288 / #613 / 0.015% |
| 1992 | 351 / #544 / 0.018% |
| 1991 | 375 / #514 / 0.019% |
| 1990 | 380 / #506 / 0.019% |
| 1989 | 402 / #475 / 0.020% |
| 1988 | 383 / #467 / 0.020% |
| 1987 | 310 / #510 / 0.017% |
| 1986 | 323 / #487 / 0.018% |
| 1985 | 351 / #459 / 0.019% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 292 / #492 / 0.016% |
| 1983 | 311 / #479 / 0.017% |
| 1982 | 325 / #470 / 0.018% |
| 1981 | 408 / #404 / 0.023% |
| 1980 | 407 / #402 / 0.023% |
| 1979 | 438 / #386 / 0.025% |
| 1978 | 439 / #367 / 0.027% |
| 1977 | 522 / #344 / 0.032% |
| 1976 | 591 / #302 / 0.038% |
| 1975 | 681 / #280 / 0.044% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 815 / #245 / 0.052% |
| 1973 | 1,040 / #208 / 0.067% |
| 1972 | 1,392 / #178 / 0.086% |
| 1971 | 1,923 / #153 / 0.109% |
| 1970 | 2,465 / #136 / 0.133% |
| 1969 | 2,869 / #112 / 0.160% |
| 1968 | 3,216 / #93 / 0.185% |
| 1967 | 3,758 / #84 / 0.216% |
| 1966 | 4,526 / #69 / 0.254% |
| 1965 | 6,037 / #51 / 0.325% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 7,768 / #47 / 0.390% |
| 1963 | 9,046 / #44 / 0.445% |
| 1962 | 10,525 / #39 / 0.509% |
| 1961 | 11,673 / #36 / 0.550% |
| 1960 | 12,041 / #36 / 0.565% |
| 1959 | 11,997 / #37 / 0.562% |
| 1958 | 10,779 / #40 / 0.508% |
| 1957 | 7,247 / #53 / 0.336% |
| 1956 | 3,901 / #97 / 0.184% |
| 1955 | 2,731 / #123 / 0.133% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 2,503 / #130 / 0.123% |
| 1953 | 2,277 / #136 / 0.115% |
| 1952 | 2,101 / #136 / 0.108% |
| 1951 | 2,198 / #128 / 0.117% |
| 1950 | 2,615 / #113 / 0.146% |
| 1949 | 3,742 / #88 / 0.211% |
| 1948 | 5,045 / #68 / 0.288% |
| 1947 | 5,750 / #65 / 0.314% |
| 1946 | 4,854 / #64 / 0.299% |
| 1945 | 3,592 / #69 / 0.267% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 3,084 / #80 / 0.226% |
| 1943 | 2,803 / #90 / 0.196% |
| 1942 | 2,293 / #106 / 0.166% |
| 1941 | 1,933 / #111 / 0.157% |
| 1940 | 1,549 / #122 / 0.134% |
| 1939 | 1,348 / #129 / 0.122% |
| 1938 | 1,055 / #154 / 0.095% |
| 1937 | 871 / #168 / 0.082% |
| 1936 | 774 / #174 / 0.075% |
| 1935 | 728 / #184 / 0.070% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 650 / #193 / 0.063% |
| 1933 | 574 / #203 / 0.058% |
| 1932 | 624 / #206 / 0.060% |
| 1931 | 693 / #190 / 0.067% |
| 1930 | 711 / #197 / 0.065% |
| 1929 | 696 / #195 / 0.065% |
| 1928 | 761 / #187 / 0.069% |
| 1927 | 800 / #180 / 0.071% |
| 1926 | 857 / #170 / 0.077% |
| 1925 | 908 / #164 / 0.081% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 963 / #164 / 0.085% |
| 1923 | 1,006 / #155 / 0.092% |
| 1922 | 931 / #163 / 0.086% |
| 1921 | 1,080 / #145 / 0.098% |
| 1920 | 1,074 / #141 / 0.101% |
| 1919 | 1,122 / #132 / 0.114% |
| 1918 | 1,287 / #127 / 0.127% |
| 1917 | 1,181 / #126 / 0.128% |
| 1916 | 1,114 / #125 / 0.125% |
| 1915 | 1,029 / #129 / 0.121% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 794 / #129 / 0.121% |
| 1913 | 520 / #145 / 0.101% |
| 1912 | 430 / #144 / 0.100% |
| 1911 | 243 / #138 / 0.108% |
| 1910 | 222 / #143 / 0.114% |
| 1909 | 167 / #152 / 0.102% |
| 1908 | 139 / #167 / 0.090% |
| 1907 | 157 / #147 / 0.107% |
| 1906 | 141 / #146 / 0.106% |
| 1905 | 117 / #167 / 0.088% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 118 / #161 / 0.092% |
| 1903 | 113 / #157 / 0.095% |
| 1902 | 99 / #173 / 0.081% |
| 1901 | 98 / #158 / 0.092% |
| 1900 | 132 / #159 / 0.088% |
| 1899 | 83 / #176 / 0.078% |
| 1898 | 106 / #160 / 0.086% |
| 1897 | 92 / #168 / 0.082% |
| 1896 | 85 / #193 / 0.071% |
| 1895 | 85 / #186 / 0.072% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 87 / #173 / 0.075% |
| 1893 | 67 / #207 / 0.060% |
| 1892 | 76 / #199 / 0.062% |
| 1891 | 64 / #196 / 0.063% |
| 1890 | 83 / #170 / 0.075% |
| 1889 | 72 / #186 / 0.065% |
| 1888 | 81 / #185 / 0.067% |
| 1887 | 73 / #175 / 0.072% |
| 1886 | 84 / #166 / 0.076% |
| 1885 | 84 / #159 / 0.078% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 84 / #166 / 0.073% |
| 1883 | 73 / #170 / 0.070% |
| 1882 | 89 / #156 / 0.078% |
| 1881 | 44 / #231 / 0.044% |
| 1880 | 95 / #143 / 0.086% |