Total babies named Nannie (all years): 25,580
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1991 | 6 / #12585 / 0.000% |
| 1988 | 5 / #13200 / 0.000% |
| 1986 | 5 / #12180 / 0.000% |
| 1981 | 6 / #9955 / 0.000% |
| 1979 | 9 / #7116 / 0.001% |
| 1978 | 11 / #5841 / 0.001% |
| 1977 | 6 / #9243 / 0.000% |
| 1976 | 9 / #6413 / 0.001% |
| 1975 | 8 / #6919 / 0.001% |
| 1974 | 10 / #5632 / 0.001% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1973 | 8 / #6473 / 0.001% |
| 1972 | 12 / #4703 / 0.001% |
| 1971 | 10 / #5389 / 0.001% |
| 1970 | 10 / #5300 / 0.001% |
| 1969 | 20 / #3075 / 0.001% |
| 1968 | 18 / #3129 / 0.001% |
| 1967 | 20 / #2840 / 0.001% |
| 1966 | 20 / #2815 / 0.001% |
| 1965 | 12 / #3884 / 0.001% |
| 1964 | 27 / #2394 / 0.001% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1963 | 29 / #2237 / 0.002% |
| 1962 | 24 / #2511 / 0.001% |
| 1961 | 25 / #2452 / 0.001% |
| 1960 | 37 / #1877 / 0.002% |
| 1959 | 38 / #1812 / 0.002% |
| 1958 | 47 / #1569 / 0.002% |
| 1957 | 46 / #1604 / 0.002% |
| 1956 | 46 / #1574 / 0.002% |
| 1955 | 67 / #1240 / 0.003% |
| 1954 | 61 / #1271 / 0.003% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1953 | 79 / #1088 / 0.004% |
| 1952 | 79 / #1065 / 0.004% |
| 1951 | 86 / #1008 / 0.005% |
| 1950 | 91 / #941 / 0.005% |
| 1949 | 88 / #954 / 0.005% |
| 1948 | 112 / #828 / 0.007% |
| 1947 | 123 / #777 / 0.007% |
| 1946 | 123 / #729 / 0.008% |
| 1945 | 126 / #656 / 0.010% |
| 1944 | 154 / #594 / 0.012% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1943 | 164 / #588 / 0.012% |
| 1942 | 166 / #573 / 0.012% |
| 1941 | 179 / #518 / 0.015% |
| 1940 | 203 / #472 / 0.018% |
| 1939 | 202 / #470 / 0.018% |
| 1938 | 209 / #468 / 0.019% |
| 1937 | 236 / #422 / 0.022% |
| 1936 | 253 / #403 / 0.024% |
| 1935 | 269 / #391 / 0.026% |
| 1934 | 283 / #379 / 0.027% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1933 | 290 / #377 / 0.029% |
| 1932 | 307 / #363 / 0.029% |
| 1931 | 333 / #349 / 0.031% |
| 1930 | 358 / #353 / 0.032% |
| 1929 | 375 / #334 / 0.034% |
| 1928 | 420 / #325 / 0.036% |
| 1927 | 459 / #312 / 0.038% |
| 1926 | 515 / #296 / 0.043% |
| 1925 | 521 / #295 / 0.043% |
| 1924 | 561 / #279 / 0.045% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1923 | 548 / #275 / 0.045% |
| 1922 | 579 / #269 / 0.048% |
| 1921 | 610 / #272 / 0.049% |
| 1920 | 655 / #258 / 0.055% |
| 1919 | 621 / #256 / 0.055% |
| 1918 | 631 / #255 / 0.055% |
| 1917 | 596 / #254 / 0.055% |
| 1916 | 593 / #250 / 0.057% |
| 1915 | 607 / #241 / 0.062% |
| 1914 | 457 / #247 / 0.060% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1913 | 402 / #242 / 0.064% |
| 1912 | 427 / #217 / 0.077% |
| 1911 | 329 / #215 / 0.079% |
| 1910 | 334 / #197 / 0.084% |
| 1909 | 355 / #170 / 0.102% |
| 1908 | 313 / #183 / 0.094% |
| 1907 | 320 / #175 / 0.100% |
| 1906 | 323 / #167 / 0.109% |
| 1905 | 303 / #172 / 0.104% |
| 1904 | 289 / #171 / 0.105% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1903 | 325 / #157 / 0.124% |
| 1902 | 359 / #148 / 0.136% |
| 1901 | 358 / #139 / 0.150% |
| 1900 | 446 / #136 / 0.149% |
| 1899 | 331 / #142 / 0.142% |
| 1898 | 359 / #141 / 0.139% |
| 1897 | 333 / #144 / 0.142% |
| 1896 | 400 / #119 / 0.168% |
| 1895 | 355 / #129 / 0.152% |
| 1894 | 374 / #123 / 0.168% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1893 | 392 / #112 / 0.184% |
| 1892 | 385 / #119 / 0.181% |
| 1891 | 315 / #125 / 0.170% |
| 1890 | 355 / #112 / 0.186% |
| 1889 | 396 / #100 / 0.222% |
| 1888 | 373 / #104 / 0.209% |
| 1887 | 340 / #95 / 0.233% |
| 1886 | 347 / #97 / 0.240% |
| 1885 | 285 / #104 / 0.214% |
| 1884 | 314 / #97 / 0.243% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1883 | 305 / #87 / 0.272% |
| 1882 | 299 / #86 / 0.277% |
| 1881 | 258 / #88 / 0.281% |
| 1880 | 248 / #87 / 0.273% |