Total babies named Nita (all years): 14,261
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 10 / #10027 / 0.001% |
| 2023 | 15 / #7539 / 0.001% |
| 2022 | 5 / #17076 / 0.000% |
| 2021 | 5 / #17004 / 0.000% |
| 2020 | 9 / #10861 / 0.001% |
| 2019 | 16 / #7247 / 0.001% |
| 2018 | 13 / #8479 / 0.001% |
| 2017 | 12 / #9189 / 0.001% |
| 2016 | 12 / #9274 / 0.001% |
| 2015 | 13 / #8809 / 0.001% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 15 / #7964 / 0.001% |
| 2013 | 13 / #8927 / 0.001% |
| 2012 | 11 / #10237 / 0.001% |
| 2011 | 7 / #14432 / 0.000% |
| 2010 | 7 / #14569 / 0.000% |
| 2009 | 15 / #8346 / 0.001% |
| 2008 | 16 / #8013 / 0.001% |
| 2007 | 22 / #6266 / 0.001% |
| 2006 | 11 / #10424 / 0.001% |
| 2005 | 15 / #7804 / 0.001% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 12 / #9124 / 0.001% |
| 2003 | 15 / #7481 / 0.001% |
| 2002 | 15 / #7343 / 0.001% |
| 2001 | 19 / #6009 / 0.001% |
| 2000 | 18 / #6152 / 0.001% |
| 1999 | 12 / #8083 / 0.001% |
| 1998 | 15 / #6611 / 0.001% |
| 1997 | 16 / #6089 / 0.001% |
| 1996 | 9 / #9353 / 0.001% |
| 1995 | 25 / #4184 / 0.001% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 27 / #3977 / 0.002% |
| 1993 | 25 / #4208 / 0.001% |
| 1992 | 26 / #4054 / 0.001% |
| 1991 | 27 / #3904 / 0.001% |
| 1990 | 18 / #5220 / 0.001% |
| 1989 | 22 / #4327 / 0.001% |
| 1988 | 18 / #4791 / 0.001% |
| 1987 | 26 / #3492 / 0.002% |
| 1986 | 30 / #3107 / 0.002% |
| 1985 | 34 / #2782 / 0.002% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 44 / #2258 / 0.003% |
| 1983 | 37 / #2501 / 0.002% |
| 1982 | 39 / #2478 / 0.002% |
| 1981 | 47 / #2182 / 0.003% |
| 1980 | 50 / #2088 / 0.003% |
| 1979 | 67 / #1672 / 0.004% |
| 1978 | 54 / #1852 / 0.004% |
| 1977 | 55 / #1847 / 0.004% |
| 1976 | 71 / #1473 / 0.005% |
| 1975 | 68 / #1510 / 0.005% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 62 / #1560 / 0.004% |
| 1973 | 95 / #1157 / 0.007% |
| 1972 | 99 / #1126 / 0.007% |
| 1971 | 86 / #1287 / 0.005% |
| 1970 | 107 / #1104 / 0.006% |
| 1969 | 125 / #958 / 0.007% |
| 1968 | 120 / #949 / 0.007% |
| 1967 | 149 / #819 / 0.009% |
| 1966 | 152 / #810 / 0.009% |
| 1965 | 159 / #786 / 0.009% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 205 / #725 / 0.011% |
| 1963 | 267 / #619 / 0.014% |
| 1962 | 271 / #609 / 0.014% |
| 1961 | 276 / #609 / 0.014% |
| 1960 | 310 / #556 / 0.015% |
| 1959 | 325 / #541 / 0.016% |
| 1958 | 359 / #509 / 0.018% |
| 1957 | 367 / #493 / 0.018% |
| 1956 | 403 / #461 / 0.020% |
| 1955 | 396 / #453 / 0.020% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 389 / #446 / 0.020% |
| 1953 | 339 / #461 / 0.018% |
| 1952 | 344 / #457 / 0.019% |
| 1951 | 283 / #488 / 0.016% |
| 1950 | 246 / #524 / 0.014% |
| 1949 | 256 / #511 / 0.015% |
| 1948 | 265 / #502 / 0.016% |
| 1947 | 263 / #510 / 0.015% |
| 1946 | 253 / #489 / 0.016% |
| 1945 | 230 / #475 / 0.018% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 211 / #497 / 0.016% |
| 1943 | 265 / #455 / 0.019% |
| 1942 | 240 / #476 / 0.018% |
| 1941 | 220 / #473 / 0.018% |
| 1940 | 174 / #520 / 0.015% |
| 1939 | 174 / #509 / 0.016% |
| 1938 | 174 / #506 / 0.016% |
| 1937 | 175 / #500 / 0.016% |
| 1936 | 167 / #501 / 0.016% |
| 1935 | 166 / #490 / 0.016% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 174 / #489 / 0.017% |
| 1933 | 164 / #500 / 0.016% |
| 1932 | 190 / #480 / 0.018% |
| 1931 | 170 / #494 / 0.016% |
| 1930 | 174 / #508 / 0.015% |
| 1929 | 139 / #584 / 0.012% |
| 1928 | 170 / #537 / 0.015% |
| 1927 | 177 / #536 / 0.015% |
| 1926 | 164 / #552 / 0.014% |
| 1925 | 182 / #531 / 0.015% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 155 / #594 / 0.012% |
| 1923 | 152 / #585 / 0.013% |
| 1922 | 111 / #698 / 0.009% |
| 1921 | 111 / #706 / 0.009% |
| 1920 | 122 / #656 / 0.010% |
| 1919 | 109 / #671 / 0.010% |
| 1918 | 134 / #609 / 0.012% |
| 1917 | 91 / #737 / 0.008% |
| 1916 | 108 / #657 / 0.010% |
| 1915 | 114 / #614 / 0.012% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 69 / #697 / 0.009% |
| 1913 | 52 / #735 / 0.008% |
| 1912 | 70 / #580 / 0.013% |
| 1911 | 42 / #672 / 0.010% |
| 1910 | 49 / #600 / 0.012% |
| 1909 | 43 / #591 / 0.012% |
| 1908 | 40 / #600 / 0.012% |
| 1907 | 36 / #629 / 0.011% |
| 1906 | 31 / #659 / 0.011% |
| 1905 | 40 / #553 / 0.014% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 40 / #526 / 0.015% |
| 1903 | 30 / #603 / 0.011% |
| 1902 | 30 / #610 / 0.011% |
| 1901 | 25 / #643 / 0.010% |
| 1900 | 29 / #669 / 0.010% |
| 1899 | 22 / #673 / 0.009% |
| 1898 | 23 / #691 / 0.009% |
| 1897 | 21 / #694 / 0.009% |
| 1896 | 31 / #544 / 0.013% |
| 1895 | 44 / #432 / 0.019% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 35 / #484 / 0.016% |
| 1893 | 28 / #530 / 0.013% |
| 1892 | 28 / #523 / 0.013% |
| 1891 | 27 / #504 / 0.015% |
| 1890 | 20 / #594 / 0.011% |
| 1889 | 12 / #786 / 0.007% |
| 1888 | 18 / #605 / 0.010% |
| 1887 | 13 / #653 / 0.009% |
| 1886 | 7 / #965 / 0.005% |
| 1885 | 6 / #1015 / 0.005% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 15 / #554 / 0.012% |
| 1883 | 9 / #679 / 0.008% |
| 1882 | 8 / #720 / 0.007% |
| 1881 | 7 / #727 / 0.008% |