Total babies named Noah (all years): 513,572
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 20,337 / #2 / 1.186% |
| 2023 | 19,088 / #2 / 1.117% |
| 2022 | 18,735 / #2 / 1.074% |
| 2021 | 18,906 / #2 / 1.081% |
| 2020 | 18,451 / #2 / 1.070% |
| 2019 | 19,172 / #2 / 1.069% |
| 2018 | 18,429 / #2 / 1.015% |
| 2017 | 18,502 / #2 / 1.000% |
| 2016 | 19,187 / #1 / 1.011% |
| 2015 | 19,678 / #1 / 1.027% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 19,338 / #1 / 1.007% |
| 2013 | 18,287 / #1 / 0.967% |
| 2012 | 17,378 / #4 / 0.916% |
| 2011 | 16,881 / #5 / 0.889% |
| 2010 | 16,478 / #7 / 0.859% |
| 2009 | 17,261 / #9 / 0.870% |
| 2008 | 15,803 / #15 / 0.775% |
| 2007 | 16,603 / #14 / 0.800% |
| 2006 | 16,340 / #15 / 0.795% |
| 2005 | 13,905 / #23 / 0.696% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 11,911 / #29 / 0.600% |
| 2003 | 11,842 / #31 / 0.600% |
| 2002 | 12,076 / #31 / 0.622% |
| 2001 | 13,493 / #28 / 0.695% |
| 2000 | 14,282 / #27 / 0.727% |
| 1999 | 14,931 / #24 / 0.778% |
| 1998 | 13,414 / #29 / 0.702% |
| 1997 | 9,279 / #38 / 0.492% |
| 1996 | 7,184 / #50 / 0.379% |
| 1995 | 3,824 / #99 / 0.201% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 2,080 / #159 / 0.108% |
| 1993 | 1,503 / #202 / 0.077% |
| 1992 | 1,424 / #217 / 0.071% |
| 1991 | 1,315 / #225 / 0.065% |
| 1990 | 1,311 / #228 / 0.064% |
| 1989 | 1,242 / #219 / 0.062% |
| 1988 | 1,065 / #230 / 0.056% |
| 1987 | 996 / #236 / 0.053% |
| 1986 | 1,039 / #227 / 0.056% |
| 1985 | 1,109 / #217 / 0.060% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 1,246 / #194 / 0.069% |
| 1983 | 1,542 / #170 / 0.086% |
| 1982 | 1,817 / #154 / 0.100% |
| 1981 | 1,400 / #180 / 0.078% |
| 1980 | 928 / #241 / 0.052% |
| 1979 | 913 / #240 / 0.053% |
| 1978 | 689 / #283 / 0.042% |
| 1977 | 683 / #285 / 0.042% |
| 1976 | 543 / #324 / 0.035% |
| 1975 | 580 / #311 / 0.037% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 548 / #324 / 0.035% |
| 1973 | 492 / #345 / 0.032% |
| 1972 | 422 / #385 / 0.026% |
| 1971 | 478 / #367 / 0.027% |
| 1970 | 340 / #445 / 0.018% |
| 1969 | 247 / #490 / 0.014% |
| 1968 | 174 / #574 / 0.010% |
| 1967 | 154 / #601 / 0.009% |
| 1966 | 157 / #598 / 0.009% |
| 1965 | 120 / #681 / 0.006% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 138 / #660 / 0.007% |
| 1963 | 124 / #697 / 0.006% |
| 1962 | 140 / #656 / 0.007% |
| 1961 | 126 / #684 / 0.006% |
| 1960 | 139 / #667 / 0.007% |
| 1959 | 153 / #625 / 0.007% |
| 1958 | 137 / #657 / 0.006% |
| 1957 | 153 / #622 / 0.007% |
| 1956 | 138 / #647 / 0.007% |
| 1955 | 133 / #646 / 0.006% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 131 / #642 / 0.006% |
| 1953 | 161 / #562 / 0.008% |
| 1952 | 143 / #584 / 0.007% |
| 1951 | 154 / #549 / 0.008% |
| 1950 | 153 / #547 / 0.009% |
| 1949 | 149 / #548 / 0.008% |
| 1948 | 150 / #546 / 0.009% |
| 1947 | 156 / #540 / 0.009% |
| 1946 | 130 / #565 / 0.008% |
| 1945 | 133 / #518 / 0.010% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 157 / #485 / 0.012% |
| 1943 | 155 / #498 / 0.011% |
| 1942 | 182 / #461 / 0.013% |
| 1941 | 161 / #469 / 0.013% |
| 1940 | 150 / #473 / 0.013% |
| 1939 | 122 / #516 / 0.011% |
| 1938 | 145 / #480 / 0.013% |
| 1937 | 143 / #476 / 0.013% |
| 1936 | 147 / #465 / 0.014% |
| 1935 | 175 / #422 / 0.017% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 148 / #463 / 0.014% |
| 1933 | 173 / #411 / 0.017% |
| 1932 | 182 / #416 / 0.017% |
| 1931 | 180 / #421 / 0.017% |
| 1930 | 191 / #428 / 0.017% |
| 1929 | 197 / #421 / 0.018% |
| 1928 | 174 / #458 / 0.016% |
| 1927 | 236 / #385 / 0.021% |
| 1926 | 235 / #383 / 0.021% |
| 1925 | 219 / #405 / 0.020% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 239 / #392 / 0.021% |
| 1923 | 259 / #370 / 0.024% |
| 1922 | 236 / #390 / 0.022% |
| 1921 | 247 / #384 / 0.022% |
| 1920 | 242 / #384 / 0.023% |
| 1919 | 253 / #363 / 0.026% |
| 1918 | 247 / #377 / 0.024% |
| 1917 | 219 / #382 / 0.024% |
| 1916 | 229 / #356 / 0.026% |
| 1915 | 189 / #391 / 0.022% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 171 / #361 / 0.026% |
| 1913 | 141 / #348 / 0.028% |
| 1912 | 116 / #356 / 0.027% |
| 1911 | 82 / #293 / 0.036% |
| 1910 | 87 / #262 / 0.045% |
| 1909 | 62 / #286 / 0.038% |
| 1908 | 68 / #256 / 0.044% |
| 1907 | 61 / #271 / 0.042% |
| 1906 | 60 / #257 / 0.045% |
| 1905 | 60 / #253 / 0.045% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 46 / #284 / 0.036% |
| 1903 | 48 / #267 / 0.040% |
| 1902 | 69 / #215 / 0.056% |
| 1901 | 56 / #232 / 0.053% |
| 1900 | 92 / #204 / 0.061% |
| 1899 | 47 / #245 / 0.044% |
| 1898 | 68 / #212 / 0.055% |
| 1897 | 58 / #229 / 0.051% |
| 1896 | 69 / #218 / 0.058% |
| 1895 | 72 / #202 / 0.061% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 74 / #198 / 0.064% |
| 1893 | 69 / #205 / 0.061% |
| 1892 | 79 / #195 / 0.065% |
| 1891 | 76 / #170 / 0.075% |
| 1890 | 74 / #182 / 0.067% |
| 1889 | 85 / #159 / 0.077% |
| 1888 | 83 / #178 / 0.069% |
| 1887 | 94 / #138 / 0.093% |
| 1886 | 90 / #156 / 0.081% |
| 1885 | 76 / #174 / 0.071% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 94 / #146 / 0.082% |
| 1883 | 81 / #159 / 0.077% |
| 1882 | 108 / #129 / 0.095% |
| 1881 | 81 / #152 / 0.080% |
| 1880 | 103 / #130 / 0.093% |