Total babies named Philomena (all years): 9,847
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 110 / #1833 / 0.007% |
| 2023 | 79 / #2327 / 0.005% |
| 2022 | 83 / #2267 / 0.005% |
| 2021 | 77 / #2360 / 0.005% |
| 2020 | 86 / #2128 / 0.005% |
| 2019 | 92 / #2064 / 0.005% |
| 2018 | 87 / #2176 / 0.005% |
| 2017 | 92 / #2106 / 0.005% |
| 2016 | 93 / #2112 / 0.005% |
| 2015 | 78 / #2372 / 0.004% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 67 / #2639 / 0.004% |
| 2013 | 43 / #3625 / 0.002% |
| 2012 | 41 / #3836 / 0.002% |
| 2011 | 41 / #3770 / 0.002% |
| 2010 | 31 / #4707 / 0.002% |
| 2009 | 19 / #7006 / 0.001% |
| 2008 | 24 / #5909 / 0.001% |
| 2007 | 33 / #4540 / 0.002% |
| 2006 | 25 / #5507 / 0.001% |
| 2005 | 23 / #5565 / 0.001% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 27 / #4913 / 0.001% |
| 2003 | 18 / #6508 / 0.001% |
| 2002 | 17 / #6621 / 0.001% |
| 2001 | 15 / #7234 / 0.001% |
| 2000 | 17 / #6409 / 0.001% |
| 1999 | 20 / #5373 / 0.001% |
| 1998 | 21 / #5084 / 0.001% |
| 1997 | 15 / #6409 / 0.001% |
| 1996 | 15 / #6299 / 0.001% |
| 1995 | 9 / #9350 / 0.001% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 8 / #10270 / 0.000% |
| 1993 | 7 / #11445 / 0.000% |
| 1992 | 9 / #9292 / 0.000% |
| 1991 | 12 / #7282 / 0.001% |
| 1990 | 5 / #14593 / 0.000% |
| 1989 | 9 / #8547 / 0.000% |
| 1988 | 9 / #8191 / 0.001% |
| 1987 | 6 / #10865 / 0.000% |
| 1986 | 7 / #9286 / 0.000% |
| 1985 | 8 / #8100 / 0.000% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1983 | 12 / #5720 / 0.001% |
| 1982 | 7 / #8928 / 0.000% |
| 1981 | 7 / #8773 / 0.000% |
| 1980 | 7 / #8795 / 0.000% |
| 1979 | 8 / #7828 / 0.001% |
| 1978 | 15 / #4609 / 0.001% |
| 1977 | 9 / #6719 / 0.001% |
| 1976 | 7 / #7882 / 0.000% |
| 1975 | 12 / #5075 / 0.001% |
| 1974 | 11 / #5252 / 0.001% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1973 | 9 / #5922 / 0.001% |
| 1972 | 6 / #7956 / 0.000% |
| 1971 | 18 / #3614 / 0.001% |
| 1970 | 20 / #3280 / 0.001% |
| 1969 | 22 / #2892 / 0.001% |
| 1968 | 14 / #3727 / 0.001% |
| 1967 | 18 / #3039 / 0.001% |
| 1966 | 23 / #2554 / 0.001% |
| 1965 | 24 / #2521 / 0.001% |
| 1964 | 18 / #3076 / 0.001% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1963 | 21 / #2758 / 0.001% |
| 1962 | 31 / #2145 / 0.002% |
| 1961 | 25 / #2455 / 0.001% |
| 1960 | 43 / #1743 / 0.002% |
| 1959 | 46 / #1609 / 0.002% |
| 1958 | 44 / #1621 / 0.002% |
| 1957 | 39 / #1741 / 0.002% |
| 1956 | 62 / #1325 / 0.003% |
| 1955 | 52 / #1397 / 0.003% |
| 1954 | 56 / #1341 / 0.003% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1953 | 64 / #1210 / 0.003% |
| 1952 | 59 / #1247 / 0.003% |
| 1951 | 53 / #1289 / 0.003% |
| 1950 | 59 / #1209 / 0.003% |
| 1949 | 49 / #1317 / 0.003% |
| 1948 | 57 / #1207 / 0.003% |
| 1947 | 57 / #1201 / 0.003% |
| 1946 | 46 / #1286 / 0.003% |
| 1945 | 33 / #1414 / 0.003% |
| 1944 | 48 / #1137 / 0.004% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1943 | 54 / #1100 / 0.004% |
| 1942 | 67 / #956 / 0.005% |
| 1941 | 71 / #867 / 0.006% |
| 1940 | 65 / #891 / 0.006% |
| 1939 | 63 / #887 / 0.006% |
| 1938 | 81 / #783 / 0.007% |
| 1937 | 80 / #765 / 0.008% |
| 1936 | 76 / #778 / 0.007% |
| 1935 | 79 / #764 / 0.008% |
| 1934 | 110 / #640 / 0.011% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1933 | 114 / #609 / 0.011% |
| 1932 | 133 / #568 / 0.012% |
| 1931 | 156 / #529 / 0.015% |
| 1930 | 178 / #502 / 0.016% |
| 1929 | 226 / #439 / 0.020% |
| 1928 | 225 / #460 / 0.020% |
| 1927 | 267 / #421 / 0.022% |
| 1926 | 261 / #427 / 0.022% |
| 1925 | 270 / #420 / 0.022% |
| 1924 | 291 / #403 / 0.023% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1923 | 299 / #385 / 0.025% |
| 1922 | 308 / #371 / 0.026% |
| 1921 | 294 / #393 / 0.024% |
| 1920 | 270 / #404 / 0.023% |
| 1919 | 244 / #416 / 0.022% |
| 1918 | 265 / #402 / 0.023% |
| 1917 | 290 / #371 / 0.027% |
| 1916 | 296 / #358 / 0.028% |
| 1915 | 284 / #355 / 0.029% |
| 1914 | 207 / #368 / 0.027% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1913 | 156 / #388 / 0.025% |
| 1912 | 139 / #393 / 0.025% |
| 1911 | 109 / #389 / 0.026% |
| 1910 | 81 / #444 / 0.020% |
| 1909 | 72 / #438 / 0.021% |
| 1908 | 96 / #369 / 0.029% |
| 1907 | 75 / #410 / 0.024% |
| 1906 | 58 / #450 / 0.020% |
| 1905 | 73 / #396 / 0.025% |
| 1904 | 48 / #478 / 0.017% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1903 | 66 / #392 / 0.025% |
| 1902 | 47 / #462 / 0.018% |
| 1901 | 40 / #480 / 0.017% |
| 1900 | 38 / #566 / 0.013% |
| 1899 | 47 / #429 / 0.020% |
| 1898 | 33 / #569 / 0.013% |
| 1897 | 36 / #486 / 0.015% |
| 1896 | 34 / #511 / 0.014% |
| 1895 | 32 / #528 / 0.014% |
| 1894 | 25 / #593 / 0.011% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1893 | 24 / #591 / 0.011% |
| 1892 | 28 / #525 / 0.013% |
| 1891 | 16 / #690 / 0.009% |
| 1890 | 21 / #577 / 0.011% |
| 1889 | 22 / #553 / 0.012% |
| 1888 | 24 / #523 / 0.013% |
| 1887 | 9 / #840 / 0.006% |
| 1886 | 15 / #599 / 0.010% |
| 1885 | 14 / #603 / 0.011% |
| 1884 | 10 / #720 / 0.008% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1883 | 15 / #511 / 0.013% |
| 1882 | 10 / #628 / 0.009% |
| 1881 | 11 / #532 / 0.012% |
| 1880 | 10 / #572 / 0.011% |