Total babies named Porter (all years): 21,198
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 463 / #615 / 0.027% |
| 2023 | 604 / #501 / 0.035% |
| 2022 | 592 / #506 / 0.034% |
| 2021 | 698 / #443 / 0.040% |
| 2020 | 707 / #424 / 0.041% |
| 2019 | 612 / #479 / 0.034% |
| 2018 | 749 / #419 / 0.041% |
| 2017 | 802 / #399 / 0.043% |
| 2016 | 749 / #419 / 0.039% |
| 2015 | 862 / #377 / 0.045% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 857 / #368 / 0.045% |
| 2013 | 778 / #384 / 0.041% |
| 2012 | 644 / #430 / 0.034% |
| 2011 | 602 / #450 / 0.032% |
| 2010 | 602 / #447 / 0.031% |
| 2009 | 578 / #474 / 0.029% |
| 2008 | 574 / #483 / 0.028% |
| 2007 | 566 / #474 / 0.027% |
| 2006 | 553 / #479 / 0.027% |
| 2005 | 405 / #576 / 0.020% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 336 / #631 / 0.017% |
| 2003 | 314 / #646 / 0.016% |
| 2002 | 265 / #687 / 0.014% |
| 2001 | 225 / #765 / 0.012% |
| 2000 | 201 / #803 / 0.010% |
| 1999 | 176 / #862 / 0.009% |
| 1998 | 103 / #1201 / 0.005% |
| 1997 | 80 / #1383 / 0.004% |
| 1996 | 71 / #1453 / 0.004% |
| 1995 | 65 / #1488 / 0.003% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 66 / #1465 / 0.003% |
| 1993 | 49 / #1762 / 0.003% |
| 1992 | 37 / #2119 / 0.002% |
| 1991 | 37 / #2041 / 0.002% |
| 1990 | 36 / #2073 / 0.002% |
| 1989 | 27 / #2453 / 0.001% |
| 1988 | 25 / #2419 / 0.001% |
| 1987 | 25 / #2316 / 0.001% |
| 1986 | 26 / #2209 / 0.001% |
| 1985 | 31 / #1907 / 0.002% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 24 / #2219 / 0.001% |
| 1983 | 31 / #1805 / 0.002% |
| 1982 | 27 / #2045 / 0.001% |
| 1981 | 22 / #2316 / 0.001% |
| 1980 | 19 / #2596 / 0.001% |
| 1979 | 15 / #2986 / 0.001% |
| 1978 | 19 / #2454 / 0.001% |
| 1977 | 32 / #1698 / 0.002% |
| 1976 | 16 / #2678 / 0.001% |
| 1975 | 23 / #2048 / 0.001% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 21 / #2099 / 0.001% |
| 1973 | 21 / #2018 / 0.001% |
| 1972 | 31 / #1555 / 0.002% |
| 1971 | 33 / #1517 / 0.002% |
| 1970 | 30 / #1571 / 0.002% |
| 1969 | 34 / #1392 / 0.002% |
| 1968 | 31 / #1418 / 0.002% |
| 1967 | 22 / #1699 / 0.001% |
| 1966 | 38 / #1231 / 0.002% |
| 1965 | 37 / #1266 / 0.002% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 37 / #1306 / 0.002% |
| 1963 | 42 / #1212 / 0.002% |
| 1962 | 27 / #1536 / 0.001% |
| 1961 | 36 / #1344 / 0.002% |
| 1960 | 29 / #1517 / 0.001% |
| 1959 | 36 / #1315 / 0.002% |
| 1958 | 38 / #1262 / 0.002% |
| 1957 | 46 / #1147 / 0.002% |
| 1956 | 53 / #1040 / 0.003% |
| 1955 | 61 / #964 / 0.003% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 43 / #1147 / 0.002% |
| 1953 | 44 / #1117 / 0.002% |
| 1952 | 50 / #1020 / 0.003% |
| 1951 | 48 / #1036 / 0.003% |
| 1950 | 54 / #944 / 0.003% |
| 1949 | 62 / #877 / 0.004% |
| 1948 | 46 / #1043 / 0.003% |
| 1947 | 59 / #913 / 0.003% |
| 1946 | 53 / #920 / 0.003% |
| 1945 | 40 / #1014 / 0.003% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 42 / #1015 / 0.003% |
| 1943 | 66 / #813 / 0.005% |
| 1942 | 73 / #752 / 0.005% |
| 1941 | 57 / #844 / 0.005% |
| 1940 | 61 / #798 / 0.005% |
| 1939 | 57 / #809 / 0.005% |
| 1938 | 70 / #735 / 0.006% |
| 1937 | 65 / #763 / 0.006% |
| 1936 | 58 / #809 / 0.006% |
| 1935 | 51 / #891 / 0.005% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 59 / #819 / 0.006% |
| 1933 | 69 / #738 / 0.007% |
| 1932 | 74 / #725 / 0.007% |
| 1931 | 74 / #708 / 0.007% |
| 1930 | 78 / #707 / 0.007% |
| 1929 | 84 / #672 / 0.008% |
| 1928 | 107 / #599 / 0.010% |
| 1927 | 81 / #723 / 0.007% |
| 1926 | 76 / #735 / 0.007% |
| 1925 | 102 / #625 / 0.009% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 104 / #632 / 0.009% |
| 1923 | 88 / #691 / 0.008% |
| 1922 | 101 / #645 / 0.009% |
| 1921 | 119 / #582 / 0.011% |
| 1920 | 120 / #571 / 0.011% |
| 1919 | 114 / #561 / 0.012% |
| 1918 | 115 / #566 / 0.011% |
| 1917 | 108 / #569 / 0.012% |
| 1916 | 131 / #498 / 0.015% |
| 1915 | 103 / #556 / 0.012% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 97 / #499 / 0.015% |
| 1913 | 76 / #500 / 0.015% |
| 1912 | 68 / #479 / 0.016% |
| 1911 | 44 / #443 / 0.019% |
| 1910 | 40 / #437 / 0.021% |
| 1909 | 26 / #515 / 0.016% |
| 1908 | 31 / #436 / 0.020% |
| 1907 | 29 / #434 / 0.020% |
| 1906 | 24 / #462 / 0.018% |
| 1905 | 35 / #354 / 0.026% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 27 / #406 / 0.021% |
| 1903 | 22 / #445 / 0.018% |
| 1902 | 33 / #346 / 0.027% |
| 1901 | 25 / #377 / 0.023% |
| 1900 | 25 / #465 / 0.017% |
| 1899 | 25 / #372 / 0.024% |
| 1898 | 34 / #333 / 0.028% |
| 1897 | 27 / #365 / 0.024% |
| 1896 | 26 / #384 / 0.022% |
| 1895 | 25 / #388 / 0.021% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 26 / #363 / 0.022% |
| 1893 | 25 / #365 / 0.022% |
| 1892 | 35 / #316 / 0.029% |
| 1891 | 20 / #393 / 0.020% |
| 1890 | 26 / #349 / 0.023% |
| 1889 | 20 / #414 / 0.018% |
| 1888 | 37 / #295 / 0.031% |
| 1887 | 14 / #479 / 0.014% |
| 1886 | 24 / #356 / 0.022% |
| 1885 | 36 / #281 / 0.033% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 22 / #383 / 0.019% |
| 1883 | 23 / #354 / 0.022% |
| 1882 | 28 / #329 / 0.025% |
| 1881 | 32 / #284 / 0.032% |
| 1880 | 38 / #275 / 0.034% |