Total babies named Rachael (all years): 82,621
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 38 / #3935 / 0.002% |
| 2023 | 57 / #2966 / 0.004% |
| 2022 | 48 / #3355 / 0.003% |
| 2021 | 51 / #3201 / 0.003% |
| 2020 | 65 / #2619 / 0.004% |
| 2019 | 80 / #2283 / 0.005% |
| 2018 | 114 / #1794 / 0.007% |
| 2017 | 116 / #1798 / 0.007% |
| 2016 | 163 / #1424 / 0.009% |
| 2015 | 185 / #1299 / 0.010% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 210 / #1172 / 0.012% |
| 2013 | 244 / #1024 / 0.014% |
| 2012 | 296 / #895 / 0.017% |
| 2011 | 321 / #826 / 0.018% |
| 2010 | 409 / #699 / 0.023% |
| 2009 | 491 / #615 / 0.027% |
| 2008 | 658 / #481 / 0.035% |
| 2007 | 834 / #393 / 0.043% |
| 2006 | 814 / #393 / 0.043% |
| 2005 | 797 / #392 / 0.043% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 845 / #369 / 0.046% |
| 2003 | 971 / #320 / 0.053% |
| 2002 | 1,041 / #300 / 0.058% |
| 2001 | 1,304 / #244 / 0.072% |
| 2000 | 1,389 / #228 / 0.076% |
| 1999 | 1,654 / #187 / 0.093% |
| 1998 | 1,744 / #170 / 0.099% |
| 1997 | 2,039 / #154 / 0.117% |
| 1996 | 2,485 / #128 / 0.142% |
| 1995 | 2,606 / #120 / 0.148% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 2,552 / #124 / 0.143% |
| 1993 | 2,746 / #117 / 0.152% |
| 1992 | 2,745 / #123 / 0.149% |
| 1991 | 2,915 / #114 / 0.155% |
| 1990 | 3,028 / #111 / 0.159% |
| 1989 | 2,833 / #109 / 0.154% |
| 1988 | 2,831 / #100 / 0.159% |
| 1987 | 2,833 / #98 / 0.163% |
| 1986 | 2,699 / #103 / 0.157% |
| 1985 | 2,761 / #100 / 0.160% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 2,652 / #103 / 0.158% |
| 1983 | 2,410 / #123 / 0.144% |
| 1982 | 2,473 / #120 / 0.146% |
| 1981 | 2,131 / #132 / 0.128% |
| 1980 | 2,047 / #142 / 0.123% |
| 1979 | 1,853 / #151 / 0.115% |
| 1978 | 1,694 / #162 / 0.111% |
| 1977 | 1,486 / #185 / 0.097% |
| 1976 | 1,438 / #177 / 0.098% |
| 1975 | 1,376 / #185 / 0.094% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 1,188 / #215 / 0.081% |
| 1973 | 972 / #258 / 0.067% |
| 1972 | 980 / #269 / 0.064% |
| 1971 | 850 / #312 / 0.051% |
| 1970 | 886 / #313 / 0.051% |
| 1969 | 726 / #333 / 0.043% |
| 1968 | 483 / #433 / 0.029% |
| 1967 | 446 / #448 / 0.027% |
| 1966 | 262 / #584 / 0.015% |
| 1965 | 217 / #668 / 0.012% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 201 / #734 / 0.011% |
| 1963 | 195 / #736 / 0.010% |
| 1962 | 180 / #779 / 0.009% |
| 1961 | 189 / #757 / 0.009% |
| 1960 | 150 / #850 / 0.007% |
| 1959 | 141 / #870 / 0.007% |
| 1958 | 180 / #745 / 0.009% |
| 1957 | 122 / #935 / 0.006% |
| 1956 | 121 / #921 / 0.006% |
| 1955 | 115 / #920 / 0.006% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 148 / #771 / 0.008% |
| 1953 | 143 / #766 / 0.008% |
| 1952 | 98 / #944 / 0.005% |
| 1951 | 93 / #966 / 0.005% |
| 1950 | 88 / #969 / 0.005% |
| 1949 | 101 / #875 / 0.006% |
| 1948 | 85 / #946 / 0.005% |
| 1947 | 78 / #1007 / 0.004% |
| 1946 | 75 / #968 / 0.005% |
| 1945 | 55 / #1057 / 0.004% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 69 / #933 / 0.005% |
| 1943 | 61 / #1026 / 0.004% |
| 1942 | 70 / #944 / 0.005% |
| 1941 | 65 / #915 / 0.005% |
| 1940 | 67 / #875 / 0.006% |
| 1939 | 60 / #916 / 0.005% |
| 1938 | 61 / #910 / 0.006% |
| 1937 | 55 / #938 / 0.005% |
| 1936 | 48 / #1000 / 0.005% |
| 1935 | 50 / #981 / 0.005% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 47 / #1017 / 0.005% |
| 1933 | 50 / #983 / 0.005% |
| 1932 | 52 / #988 / 0.005% |
| 1931 | 34 / #1255 / 0.003% |
| 1930 | 65 / #907 / 0.006% |
| 1929 | 57 / #958 / 0.005% |
| 1928 | 67 / #901 / 0.006% |
| 1927 | 86 / #785 / 0.007% |
| 1926 | 92 / #755 / 0.008% |
| 1925 | 83 / #818 / 0.007% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 96 / #764 / 0.008% |
| 1923 | 103 / #720 / 0.009% |
| 1922 | 115 / #681 / 0.010% |
| 1921 | 144 / #607 / 0.012% |
| 1920 | 119 / #664 / 0.010% |
| 1919 | 118 / #640 / 0.010% |
| 1918 | 139 / #605 / 0.012% |
| 1917 | 145 / #564 / 0.013% |
| 1916 | 160 / #517 / 0.015% |
| 1915 | 96 / #672 / 0.010% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 67 / #709 / 0.009% |
| 1913 | 60 / #672 / 0.010% |
| 1912 | 59 / #657 / 0.011% |
| 1911 | 43 / #664 / 0.010% |
| 1910 | 45 / #634 / 0.011% |
| 1909 | 21 / #902 / 0.006% |
| 1908 | 23 / #824 / 0.007% |
| 1907 | 21 / #831 / 0.007% |
| 1906 | 28 / #698 / 0.009% |
| 1905 | 23 / #774 / 0.008% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 24 / #723 / 0.009% |
| 1903 | 32 / #587 / 0.012% |
| 1902 | 19 / #815 / 0.007% |
| 1901 | 19 / #762 / 0.008% |
| 1900 | 44 / #513 / 0.015% |
| 1899 | 22 / #676 / 0.009% |
| 1898 | 19 / #786 / 0.007% |
| 1897 | 18 / #757 / 0.008% |
| 1896 | 19 / #748 / 0.008% |
| 1895 | 26 / #603 / 0.011% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 21 / #659 / 0.009% |
| 1893 | 16 / #761 / 0.008% |
| 1892 | 19 / #679 / 0.009% |
| 1891 | 17 / #660 / 0.009% |
| 1890 | 8 / #1080 / 0.004% |
| 1889 | 16 / #655 / 0.009% |
| 1888 | 18 / #607 / 0.010% |
| 1887 | 13 / #655 / 0.009% |
| 1886 | 14 / #630 / 0.010% |
| 1885 | 8 / #834 / 0.006% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 7 / #910 / 0.005% |
| 1883 | 9 / #683 / 0.008% |
| 1882 | 8 / #726 / 0.007% |
| 1881 | 8 / #667 / 0.009% |
| 1880 | 12 / #514 / 0.013% |