Total babies named Rayford (all years): 5,511
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2023 | 6 / #11929 / 0.000% |
| 2021 | 6 / #11810 / 0.000% |
| 2017 | 6 / #11881 / 0.000% |
| 2014 | 7 / #10475 / 0.000% |
| 2013 | 6 / #11834 / 0.000% |
| 2012 | 5 / #13762 / 0.000% |
| 2011 | 5 / #13870 / 0.000% |
| 2010 | 6 / #11862 / 0.000% |
| 2008 | 10 / #8154 / 0.000% |
| 2007 | 6 / #12035 / 0.000% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2006 | 7 / #10403 / 0.000% |
| 2005 | 11 / #7005 / 0.001% |
| 2004 | 10 / #7396 / 0.001% |
| 2002 | 12 / #5994 / 0.001% |
| 2001 | 14 / #5341 / 0.001% |
| 2000 | 6 / #10051 / 0.000% |
| 1999 | 11 / #5958 / 0.001% |
| 1998 | 10 / #6192 / 0.001% |
| 1997 | 10 / #5997 / 0.001% |
| 1996 | 12 / #5116 / 0.001% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1995 | 7 / #7611 / 0.000% |
| 1994 | 11 / #5379 / 0.001% |
| 1993 | 8 / #6687 / 0.000% |
| 1992 | 17 / #3710 / 0.001% |
| 1991 | 23 / #2896 / 0.001% |
| 1990 | 22 / #2940 / 0.001% |
| 1989 | 20 / #3066 / 0.001% |
| 1988 | 21 / #2749 / 0.001% |
| 1987 | 22 / #2536 / 0.001% |
| 1986 | 26 / #2212 / 0.001% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1985 | 18 / #2800 / 0.001% |
| 1984 | 31 / #1832 / 0.002% |
| 1983 | 22 / #2323 / 0.001% |
| 1982 | 34 / #1727 / 0.002% |
| 1981 | 30 / #1891 / 0.002% |
| 1980 | 24 / #2204 / 0.001% |
| 1979 | 35 / #1661 / 0.002% |
| 1978 | 29 / #1824 / 0.002% |
| 1977 | 31 / #1734 / 0.002% |
| 1976 | 23 / #2098 / 0.001% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1975 | 36 / #1497 / 0.002% |
| 1974 | 35 / #1496 / 0.002% |
| 1973 | 24 / #1864 / 0.002% |
| 1972 | 43 / #1283 / 0.003% |
| 1971 | 52 / #1144 / 0.003% |
| 1970 | 40 / #1331 / 0.002% |
| 1969 | 50 / #1105 / 0.003% |
| 1968 | 58 / #966 / 0.003% |
| 1967 | 71 / #855 / 0.004% |
| 1966 | 57 / #965 / 0.003% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1965 | 56 / #993 / 0.003% |
| 1964 | 64 / #954 / 0.003% |
| 1963 | 61 / #969 / 0.003% |
| 1962 | 79 / #852 / 0.004% |
| 1961 | 69 / #923 / 0.003% |
| 1960 | 76 / #873 / 0.004% |
| 1959 | 56 / #1031 / 0.003% |
| 1958 | 83 / #827 / 0.004% |
| 1957 | 82 / #839 / 0.004% |
| 1956 | 93 / #769 / 0.004% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1955 | 89 / #777 / 0.004% |
| 1954 | 96 / #738 / 0.005% |
| 1953 | 87 / #764 / 0.004% |
| 1952 | 111 / #659 / 0.006% |
| 1951 | 96 / #710 / 0.005% |
| 1950 | 99 / #689 / 0.006% |
| 1949 | 90 / #726 / 0.005% |
| 1948 | 91 / #702 / 0.005% |
| 1947 | 105 / #676 / 0.006% |
| 1946 | 99 / #651 / 0.006% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1945 | 77 / #697 / 0.006% |
| 1944 | 111 / #584 / 0.008% |
| 1943 | 103 / #627 / 0.007% |
| 1942 | 92 / #676 / 0.007% |
| 1941 | 84 / #669 / 0.007% |
| 1940 | 96 / #606 / 0.008% |
| 1939 | 88 / #627 / 0.008% |
| 1938 | 101 / #585 / 0.009% |
| 1937 | 124 / #518 / 0.012% |
| 1936 | 82 / #642 / 0.008% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1935 | 91 / #615 / 0.009% |
| 1934 | 93 / #622 / 0.009% |
| 1933 | 78 / #666 / 0.008% |
| 1932 | 96 / #604 / 0.009% |
| 1931 | 80 / #671 / 0.008% |
| 1930 | 90 / #652 / 0.008% |
| 1929 | 90 / #653 / 0.008% |
| 1928 | 95 / #641 / 0.009% |
| 1927 | 92 / #666 / 0.008% |
| 1926 | 83 / #697 / 0.007% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1925 | 98 / #643 / 0.009% |
| 1924 | 81 / #742 / 0.007% |
| 1923 | 78 / #743 / 0.007% |
| 1922 | 80 / #740 / 0.007% |
| 1921 | 71 / #811 / 0.006% |
| 1920 | 73 / #780 / 0.007% |
| 1919 | 79 / #714 / 0.008% |
| 1918 | 60 / #854 / 0.006% |
| 1917 | 50 / #905 / 0.005% |
| 1916 | 27 / #1327 / 0.003% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1915 | 44 / #950 / 0.005% |
| 1914 | 29 / #1071 / 0.004% |
| 1913 | 28 / #947 / 0.005% |
| 1912 | 23 / #962 / 0.005% |
| 1911 | 13 / #969 / 0.006% |
| 1910 | 7 / #1398 / 0.004% |
| 1909 | 13 / #831 / 0.008% |
| 1908 | 6 / #1342 / 0.004% |
| 1907 | 8 / #1072 / 0.005% |
| 1906 | 5 / #1380 / 0.004% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1903 | 5 / #1271 / 0.004% |
| 1901 | 5 / #1177 / 0.005% |
| 1900 | 6 / #1279 / 0.004% |
| 1896 | 8 / #882 / 0.007% |