Total babies named Roderick (all years): 47,351
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 83 / #1909 / 0.005% |
| 2023 | 82 / #1923 / 0.005% |
| 2022 | 103 / #1674 / 0.006% |
| 2021 | 96 / #1706 / 0.005% |
| 2020 | 100 / #1618 / 0.006% |
| 2019 | 134 / #1344 / 0.007% |
| 2018 | 131 / #1358 / 0.007% |
| 2017 | 160 / #1173 / 0.009% |
| 2016 | 199 / #1017 / 0.010% |
| 2015 | 185 / #1070 / 0.010% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 178 / #1087 / 0.009% |
| 2013 | 178 / #1059 / 0.009% |
| 2012 | 204 / #982 / 0.011% |
| 2011 | 220 / #917 / 0.012% |
| 2010 | 206 / #964 / 0.011% |
| 2009 | 229 / #904 / 0.012% |
| 2008 | 217 / #939 / 0.011% |
| 2007 | 255 / #838 / 0.012% |
| 2006 | 292 / #733 / 0.014% |
| 2005 | 249 / #783 / 0.012% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 265 / #721 / 0.013% |
| 2003 | 240 / #749 / 0.012% |
| 2002 | 305 / #639 / 0.016% |
| 2001 | 288 / #650 / 0.015% |
| 2000 | 310 / #615 / 0.016% |
| 1999 | 331 / #588 / 0.017% |
| 1998 | 290 / #628 / 0.015% |
| 1997 | 356 / #550 / 0.019% |
| 1996 | 361 / #535 / 0.019% |
| 1995 | 399 / #512 / 0.021% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 437 / #486 / 0.023% |
| 1993 | 489 / #447 / 0.025% |
| 1992 | 511 / #432 / 0.026% |
| 1991 | 540 / #418 / 0.027% |
| 1990 | 599 / #387 / 0.029% |
| 1989 | 610 / #367 / 0.030% |
| 1988 | 568 / #361 / 0.030% |
| 1987 | 597 / #338 / 0.032% |
| 1986 | 631 / #322 / 0.034% |
| 1985 | 668 / #308 / 0.036% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 629 / #311 / 0.035% |
| 1983 | 682 / #294 / 0.038% |
| 1982 | 740 / #279 / 0.041% |
| 1981 | 742 / #279 / 0.041% |
| 1980 | 758 / #278 / 0.042% |
| 1979 | 746 / #275 / 0.043% |
| 1978 | 691 / #280 / 0.042% |
| 1977 | 760 / #260 / 0.046% |
| 1976 | 783 / #253 / 0.050% |
| 1975 | 796 / #252 / 0.051% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 880 / #235 / 0.056% |
| 1973 | 908 / #231 / 0.058% |
| 1972 | 940 / #229 / 0.058% |
| 1971 | 1,057 / #223 / 0.060% |
| 1970 | 1,037 / #228 / 0.056% |
| 1969 | 980 / #234 / 0.055% |
| 1968 | 998 / #227 / 0.057% |
| 1967 | 1,008 / #221 / 0.058% |
| 1966 | 961 / #226 / 0.054% |
| 1965 | 997 / #231 / 0.054% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 1,027 / #234 / 0.052% |
| 1963 | 990 / #243 / 0.049% |
| 1962 | 932 / #253 / 0.045% |
| 1961 | 900 / #260 / 0.042% |
| 1960 | 844 / #276 / 0.040% |
| 1959 | 809 / #279 / 0.038% |
| 1958 | 699 / #289 / 0.033% |
| 1957 | 766 / #274 / 0.036% |
| 1956 | 682 / #282 / 0.032% |
| 1955 | 646 / #282 / 0.031% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 572 / #299 / 0.028% |
| 1953 | 632 / #277 / 0.032% |
| 1952 | 546 / #304 / 0.028% |
| 1951 | 466 / #320 / 0.025% |
| 1950 | 475 / #314 / 0.027% |
| 1949 | 401 / #336 / 0.023% |
| 1948 | 364 / #351 / 0.021% |
| 1947 | 368 / #356 / 0.020% |
| 1946 | 302 / #375 / 0.019% |
| 1945 | 248 / #379 / 0.018% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 234 / #398 / 0.017% |
| 1943 | 222 / #415 / 0.016% |
| 1942 | 202 / #434 / 0.015% |
| 1941 | 160 / #472 / 0.013% |
| 1940 | 162 / #457 / 0.014% |
| 1939 | 189 / #414 / 0.017% |
| 1938 | 191 / #410 / 0.017% |
| 1937 | 188 / #416 / 0.018% |
| 1936 | 180 / #411 / 0.017% |
| 1935 | 151 / #462 / 0.015% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 170 / #432 / 0.016% |
| 1933 | 166 / #428 / 0.017% |
| 1932 | 140 / #486 / 0.013% |
| 1931 | 156 / #451 / 0.015% |
| 1930 | 153 / #482 / 0.014% |
| 1929 | 177 / #448 / 0.016% |
| 1928 | 182 / #443 / 0.016% |
| 1927 | 178 / #459 / 0.016% |
| 1926 | 174 / #458 / 0.016% |
| 1925 | 148 / #501 / 0.013% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 140 / #533 / 0.012% |
| 1923 | 131 / #534 / 0.012% |
| 1922 | 137 / #536 / 0.013% |
| 1921 | 106 / #619 / 0.010% |
| 1920 | 105 / #617 / 0.010% |
| 1919 | 76 / #737 / 0.008% |
| 1918 | 90 / #650 / 0.009% |
| 1917 | 96 / #609 / 0.010% |
| 1916 | 82 / #648 / 0.009% |
| 1915 | 84 / #636 / 0.010% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 65 / #631 / 0.010% |
| 1913 | 74 / #506 / 0.014% |
| 1912 | 46 / #606 / 0.011% |
| 1911 | 17 / #817 / 0.008% |
| 1910 | 14 / #854 / 0.007% |
| 1909 | 11 / #944 / 0.007% |
| 1908 | 13 / #772 / 0.008% |
| 1907 | 9 / #988 / 0.006% |
| 1906 | 12 / #745 / 0.009% |
| 1905 | 5 / #1389 / 0.004% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 9 / #864 / 0.007% |
| 1903 | 14 / #613 / 0.012% |
| 1902 | 8 / #916 / 0.007% |
| 1901 | 8 / #842 / 0.008% |
| 1900 | 13 / #724 / 0.009% |
| 1899 | 6 / #1034 / 0.006% |
| 1898 | 12 / #656 / 0.010% |
| 1897 | 9 / #776 / 0.008% |
| 1896 | 9 / #816 / 0.008% |
| 1894 | 10 / #715 / 0.009% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1893 | 6 / #1008 / 0.005% |
| 1892 | 7 / #937 / 0.006% |
| 1891 | 15 / #470 / 0.015% |
| 1890 | 8 / #800 / 0.007% |
| 1889 | 9 / #714 / 0.008% |
| 1888 | 7 / #899 / 0.006% |
| 1887 | 13 / #511 / 0.013% |
| 1886 | 5 / #1080 / 0.005% |
| 1885 | 8 / #752 / 0.007% |
| 1884 | 5 / #1095 / 0.004% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1882 | 6 / #927 / 0.005% |
| 1880 | 7 / #795 / 0.006% |