Total babies named Samuel (all years): 814,600
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 8,310 / #17 / 0.484% |
| 2023 | 8,019 / #19 / 0.469% |
| 2022 | 8,414 / #19 / 0.482% |
| 2021 | 8,573 / #23 / 0.490% |
| 2020 | 8,585 / #25 / 0.498% |
| 2019 | 9,321 / #22 / 0.520% |
| 2018 | 9,850 / #21 / 0.543% |
| 2017 | 10,447 / #21 / 0.565% |
| 2016 | 10,615 / #21 / 0.560% |
| 2015 | 10,900 / #23 / 0.569% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 11,024 / #23 / 0.574% |
| 2013 | 11,139 / #25 / 0.589% |
| 2012 | 11,468 / #25 / 0.605% |
| 2011 | 11,366 / #26 / 0.599% |
| 2010 | 11,971 / #24 / 0.624% |
| 2009 | 12,175 / #24 / 0.614% |
| 2008 | 12,773 / #27 / 0.626% |
| 2007 | 13,366 / #25 / 0.644% |
| 2006 | 13,645 / #25 / 0.664% |
| 2005 | 14,269 / #21 / 0.714% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 14,128 / #23 / 0.712% |
| 2003 | 14,687 / #23 / 0.744% |
| 2002 | 14,579 / #25 / 0.751% |
| 2001 | 14,813 / #26 / 0.762% |
| 2000 | 14,187 / #28 / 0.722% |
| 1999 | 14,049 / #27 / 0.732% |
| 1998 | 13,912 / #28 / 0.728% |
| 1997 | 14,237 / #27 / 0.755% |
| 1996 | 13,629 / #30 / 0.720% |
| 1995 | 12,440 / #33 / 0.653% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 12,146 / #33 / 0.629% |
| 1993 | 11,710 / #37 / 0.597% |
| 1992 | 11,345 / #40 / 0.568% |
| 1991 | 11,232 / #39 / 0.556% |
| 1990 | 10,892 / #45 / 0.530% |
| 1989 | 10,107 / #47 / 0.505% |
| 1988 | 9,564 / #45 / 0.500% |
| 1987 | 8,576 / #50 / 0.459% |
| 1986 | 7,580 / #52 / 0.412% |
| 1985 | 7,010 / #54 / 0.379% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 6,361 / #55 / 0.352% |
| 1983 | 6,195 / #54 / 0.346% |
| 1982 | 6,017 / #56 / 0.332% |
| 1981 | 6,037 / #54 / 0.337% |
| 1980 | 6,013 / #54 / 0.337% |
| 1979 | 5,688 / #55 / 0.330% |
| 1978 | 5,393 / #57 / 0.328% |
| 1977 | 5,259 / #60 / 0.320% |
| 1976 | 5,026 / #59 / 0.320% |
| 1975 | 4,621 / #61 / 0.296% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 4,671 / #60 / 0.297% |
| 1973 | 4,266 / #66 / 0.274% |
| 1972 | 4,214 / #66 / 0.260% |
| 1971 | 4,406 / #66 / 0.249% |
| 1970 | 4,559 / #62 / 0.245% |
| 1969 | 4,431 / #64 / 0.248% |
| 1968 | 4,121 / #66 / 0.237% |
| 1967 | 4,232 / #69 / 0.243% |
| 1966 | 4,158 / #81 / 0.233% |
| 1965 | 4,394 / #84 / 0.236% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 4,463 / #86 / 0.224% |
| 1963 | 4,522 / #87 / 0.223% |
| 1962 | 4,552 / #88 / 0.220% |
| 1961 | 4,666 / #89 / 0.220% |
| 1960 | 4,711 / #91 / 0.221% |
| 1959 | 4,953 / #86 / 0.232% |
| 1958 | 5,051 / #85 / 0.238% |
| 1957 | 5,237 / #82 / 0.243% |
| 1956 | 5,584 / #74 / 0.264% |
| 1955 | 5,534 / #71 / 0.269% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 5,634 / #71 / 0.276% |
| 1953 | 5,423 / #70 / 0.275% |
| 1952 | 5,648 / #67 / 0.291% |
| 1951 | 5,476 / #67 / 0.291% |
| 1950 | 5,226 / #62 / 0.292% |
| 1949 | 5,357 / #62 / 0.302% |
| 1948 | 5,003 / #70 / 0.285% |
| 1947 | 5,109 / #72 / 0.279% |
| 1946 | 4,524 / #70 / 0.279% |
| 1945 | 3,957 / #62 / 0.294% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 3,946 / #62 / 0.290% |
| 1943 | 4,142 / #62 / 0.290% |
| 1942 | 4,190 / #59 / 0.303% |
| 1941 | 3,537 / #65 / 0.288% |
| 1940 | 3,362 / #65 / 0.290% |
| 1939 | 3,254 / #63 / 0.294% |
| 1938 | 3,243 / #62 / 0.292% |
| 1937 | 3,027 / #66 / 0.284% |
| 1936 | 2,893 / #67 / 0.279% |
| 1935 | 3,149 / #62 / 0.302% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 3,137 / #66 / 0.304% |
| 1933 | 3,111 / #61 / 0.314% |
| 1932 | 3,411 / #56 / 0.327% |
| 1931 | 3,379 / #56 / 0.325% |
| 1930 | 3,531 / #55 / 0.322% |
| 1929 | 3,567 / #53 / 0.332% |
| 1928 | 3,844 / #52 / 0.347% |
| 1927 | 4,189 / #49 / 0.372% |
| 1926 | 4,179 / #48 / 0.376% |
| 1925 | 4,405 / #46 / 0.395% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 4,592 / #45 / 0.405% |
| 1923 | 4,578 / #45 / 0.418% |
| 1922 | 4,600 / #43 / 0.423% |
| 1921 | 4,754 / #44 / 0.432% |
| 1920 | 4,654 / #44 / 0.437% |
| 1919 | 4,472 / #43 / 0.456% |
| 1918 | 4,772 / #43 / 0.471% |
| 1917 | 4,490 / #42 / 0.485% |
| 1916 | 4,399 / #41 / 0.494% |
| 1915 | 4,351 / #39 / 0.513% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 3,703 / #36 / 0.566% |
| 1913 | 2,850 / #36 / 0.556% |
| 1912 | 2,602 / #30 / 0.605% |
| 1911 | 1,398 / #30 / 0.619% |
| 1910 | 1,129 / #32 / 0.581% |
| 1909 | 983 / #32 / 0.599% |
| 1908 | 960 / #33 / 0.622% |
| 1907 | 892 / #32 / 0.608% |
| 1906 | 783 / #33 / 0.588% |
| 1905 | 856 / #30 / 0.647% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 727 / #34 / 0.567% |
| 1903 | 741 / #31 / 0.621% |
| 1902 | 702 / #33 / 0.572% |
| 1901 | 628 / #33 / 0.590% |
| 1900 | 877 / #33 / 0.583% |
| 1899 | 704 / #30 / 0.663% |
| 1898 | 749 / #32 / 0.611% |
| 1897 | 759 / #28 / 0.673% |
| 1896 | 734 / #31 / 0.614% |
| 1895 | 814 / #25 / 0.693% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 776 / #26 / 0.670% |
| 1893 | 851 / #20 / 0.758% |
| 1892 | 902 / #20 / 0.739% |
| 1891 | 753 / #20 / 0.744% |
| 1890 | 815 / #20 / 0.734% |
| 1889 | 810 / #20 / 0.733% |
| 1888 | 931 / #18 / 0.770% |
| 1887 | 802 / #18 / 0.791% |
| 1886 | 870 / #18 / 0.785% |
| 1885 | 888 / #18 / 0.824% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 945 / #17 / 0.826% |
| 1883 | 937 / #17 / 0.896% |
| 1882 | 1,003 / #17 / 0.882% |
| 1881 | 919 / #17 / 0.912% |
| 1880 | 1,024 / #17 / 0.927% |