Total babies named Silas (all years): 70,949
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 4,108 / #81 / 0.239% |
| 2023 | 4,097 / #81 / 0.240% |
| 2022 | 4,025 / #88 / 0.231% |
| 2021 | 3,912 / #91 / 0.224% |
| 2020 | 3,642 / #100 / 0.211% |
| 2019 | 3,564 / #105 / 0.199% |
| 2018 | 3,516 / #110 / 0.194% |
| 2017 | 3,338 / #120 / 0.180% |
| 2016 | 3,416 / #119 / 0.180% |
| 2015 | 3,191 / #128 / 0.167% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 2,934 / #137 / 0.153% |
| 2013 | 3,412 / #116 / 0.180% |
| 2012 | 2,497 / #160 / 0.132% |
| 2011 | 2,117 / #183 / 0.111% |
| 2010 | 1,632 / #219 / 0.085% |
| 2009 | 1,377 / #252 / 0.069% |
| 2008 | 1,074 / #310 / 0.053% |
| 2007 | 940 / #344 / 0.045% |
| 2006 | 800 / #372 / 0.039% |
| 2005 | 660 / #412 / 0.033% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 611 / #430 / 0.031% |
| 2003 | 562 / #448 / 0.028% |
| 2002 | 580 / #431 / 0.030% |
| 2001 | 376 / #558 / 0.019% |
| 2000 | 328 / #602 / 0.017% |
| 1999 | 290 / #625 / 0.015% |
| 1998 | 251 / #681 / 0.013% |
| 1997 | 230 / #694 / 0.012% |
| 1996 | 207 / #741 / 0.011% |
| 1995 | 204 / #756 / 0.011% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 153 / #869 / 0.008% |
| 1993 | 155 / #852 / 0.008% |
| 1992 | 165 / #819 / 0.008% |
| 1991 | 133 / #914 / 0.007% |
| 1990 | 118 / #962 / 0.006% |
| 1989 | 118 / #939 / 0.006% |
| 1988 | 116 / #889 / 0.006% |
| 1987 | 121 / #851 / 0.006% |
| 1986 | 115 / #846 / 0.006% |
| 1985 | 116 / #838 / 0.006% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 103 / #869 / 0.006% |
| 1983 | 123 / #788 / 0.007% |
| 1982 | 114 / #833 / 0.006% |
| 1981 | 133 / #759 / 0.007% |
| 1980 | 116 / #818 / 0.007% |
| 1979 | 112 / #824 / 0.007% |
| 1978 | 113 / #801 / 0.007% |
| 1977 | 93 / #880 / 0.006% |
| 1976 | 100 / #837 / 0.006% |
| 1975 | 111 / #791 / 0.007% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 83 / #891 / 0.005% |
| 1973 | 94 / #823 / 0.006% |
| 1972 | 74 / #939 / 0.005% |
| 1971 | 73 / #956 / 0.004% |
| 1970 | 69 / #977 / 0.004% |
| 1969 | 66 / #950 / 0.004% |
| 1968 | 62 / #928 / 0.004% |
| 1967 | 52 / #1015 / 0.003% |
| 1966 | 72 / #859 / 0.004% |
| 1965 | 90 / #784 / 0.005% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 70 / #912 / 0.004% |
| 1963 | 97 / #777 / 0.005% |
| 1962 | 78 / #859 / 0.004% |
| 1961 | 87 / #822 / 0.004% |
| 1960 | 79 / #860 / 0.004% |
| 1959 | 96 / #786 / 0.005% |
| 1958 | 104 / #731 / 0.005% |
| 1957 | 116 / #705 / 0.005% |
| 1956 | 101 / #734 / 0.005% |
| 1955 | 90 / #770 / 0.004% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 115 / #673 / 0.006% |
| 1953 | 113 / #677 / 0.006% |
| 1952 | 101 / #698 / 0.005% |
| 1951 | 94 / #718 / 0.005% |
| 1950 | 120 / #631 / 0.007% |
| 1949 | 139 / #573 / 0.008% |
| 1948 | 113 / #639 / 0.006% |
| 1947 | 132 / #594 / 0.007% |
| 1946 | 142 / #539 / 0.009% |
| 1945 | 112 / #576 / 0.008% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 118 / #562 / 0.009% |
| 1943 | 137 / #540 / 0.010% |
| 1942 | 145 / #508 / 0.011% |
| 1941 | 118 / #551 / 0.010% |
| 1940 | 120 / #538 / 0.010% |
| 1939 | 140 / #487 / 0.013% |
| 1938 | 146 / #477 / 0.013% |
| 1937 | 109 / #559 / 0.010% |
| 1936 | 145 / #468 / 0.014% |
| 1935 | 143 / #474 / 0.014% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 142 / #480 / 0.014% |
| 1933 | 143 / #469 / 0.014% |
| 1932 | 154 / #464 / 0.015% |
| 1931 | 169 / #437 / 0.016% |
| 1930 | 191 / #429 / 0.017% |
| 1929 | 177 / #449 / 0.016% |
| 1928 | 167 / #474 / 0.015% |
| 1927 | 183 / #452 / 0.016% |
| 1926 | 211 / #417 / 0.019% |
| 1925 | 219 / #406 / 0.020% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 213 / #420 / 0.019% |
| 1923 | 206 / #423 / 0.019% |
| 1922 | 213 / #413 / 0.020% |
| 1921 | 224 / #405 / 0.020% |
| 1920 | 218 / #398 / 0.020% |
| 1919 | 202 / #411 / 0.021% |
| 1918 | 229 / #394 / 0.023% |
| 1917 | 205 / #394 / 0.022% |
| 1916 | 190 / #404 / 0.021% |
| 1915 | 197 / #380 / 0.023% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 173 / #359 / 0.026% |
| 1913 | 126 / #376 / 0.025% |
| 1912 | 108 / #371 / 0.025% |
| 1911 | 59 / #362 / 0.026% |
| 1910 | 64 / #310 / 0.033% |
| 1909 | 62 / #287 / 0.038% |
| 1908 | 48 / #324 / 0.031% |
| 1907 | 45 / #321 / 0.031% |
| 1906 | 53 / #272 / 0.040% |
| 1905 | 43 / #310 / 0.033% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 51 / #269 / 0.040% |
| 1903 | 47 / #272 / 0.039% |
| 1902 | 55 / #251 / 0.045% |
| 1901 | 37 / #289 / 0.035% |
| 1900 | 68 / #249 / 0.045% |
| 1899 | 55 / #226 / 0.052% |
| 1898 | 48 / #261 / 0.039% |
| 1897 | 53 / #241 / 0.047% |
| 1896 | 63 / #228 / 0.053% |
| 1895 | 68 / #210 / 0.058% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 56 / #230 / 0.048% |
| 1893 | 57 / #225 / 0.051% |
| 1892 | 89 / #179 / 0.073% |
| 1891 | 58 / #207 / 0.057% |
| 1890 | 84 / #168 / 0.076% |
| 1889 | 67 / #196 / 0.061% |
| 1888 | 71 / #208 / 0.059% |
| 1887 | 64 / #192 / 0.063% |
| 1886 | 77 / #179 / 0.070% |
| 1885 | 73 / #180 / 0.068% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 83 / #170 / 0.073% |
| 1883 | 77 / #162 / 0.074% |
| 1882 | 92 / #149 / 0.081% |
| 1881 | 73 / #166 / 0.072% |
| 1880 | 98 / #140 / 0.089% |