Total babies named Sybil (all years): 20,212
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 136 / #1564 / 0.008% |
| 2023 | 154 / #1449 / 0.010% |
| 2022 | 145 / #1502 / 0.009% |
| 2021 | 123 / #1692 / 0.008% |
| 2020 | 101 / #1907 / 0.006% |
| 2019 | 123 / #1707 / 0.007% |
| 2018 | 109 / #1865 / 0.006% |
| 2017 | 111 / #1853 / 0.006% |
| 2016 | 106 / #1907 / 0.006% |
| 2015 | 91 / #2122 / 0.005% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 86 / #2211 / 0.005% |
| 2013 | 67 / #2655 / 0.004% |
| 2012 | 16 / #7758 / 0.001% |
| 2011 | 13 / #9086 / 0.001% |
| 2010 | 12 / #9724 / 0.001% |
| 2009 | 12 / #9914 / 0.001% |
| 2008 | 18 / #7376 / 0.001% |
| 2007 | 15 / #8471 / 0.001% |
| 2006 | 19 / #6804 / 0.001% |
| 2005 | 20 / #6219 / 0.001% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 15 / #7795 / 0.001% |
| 2003 | 9 / #11221 / 0.000% |
| 2002 | 8 / #12067 / 0.000% |
| 2001 | 18 / #6286 / 0.001% |
| 2000 | 16 / #6769 / 0.001% |
| 1999 | 9 / #10242 / 0.001% |
| 1998 | 13 / #7483 / 0.001% |
| 1997 | 15 / #6455 / 0.001% |
| 1996 | 11 / #8064 / 0.001% |
| 1995 | 20 / #5006 / 0.001% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 24 / #4364 / 0.001% |
| 1993 | 18 / #5403 / 0.001% |
| 1992 | 29 / #3764 / 0.002% |
| 1991 | 26 / #4043 / 0.001% |
| 1990 | 33 / #3350 / 0.002% |
| 1989 | 31 / #3389 / 0.002% |
| 1988 | 33 / #3088 / 0.002% |
| 1987 | 40 / #2566 / 0.002% |
| 1986 | 53 / #2051 / 0.003% |
| 1985 | 32 / #2928 / 0.002% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 39 / #2463 / 0.002% |
| 1983 | 33 / #2715 / 0.002% |
| 1982 | 47 / #2180 / 0.003% |
| 1981 | 70 / #1661 / 0.004% |
| 1980 | 93 / #1362 / 0.006% |
| 1979 | 91 / #1362 / 0.006% |
| 1978 | 61 / #1725 / 0.004% |
| 1977 | 89 / #1314 / 0.006% |
| 1976 | 104 / #1138 / 0.007% |
| 1975 | 119 / #1020 / 0.008% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 117 / #1030 / 0.008% |
| 1973 | 103 / #1103 / 0.007% |
| 1972 | 88 / #1218 / 0.006% |
| 1971 | 83 / #1313 / 0.005% |
| 1970 | 76 / #1386 / 0.004% |
| 1969 | 79 / #1267 / 0.005% |
| 1968 | 89 / #1145 / 0.005% |
| 1967 | 103 / #1017 / 0.006% |
| 1966 | 144 / #834 / 0.009% |
| 1965 | 153 / #802 / 0.009% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 143 / #868 / 0.008% |
| 1963 | 210 / #706 / 0.011% |
| 1962 | 181 / #775 / 0.009% |
| 1961 | 129 / #955 / 0.006% |
| 1960 | 165 / #808 / 0.008% |
| 1959 | 146 / #846 / 0.007% |
| 1958 | 182 / #736 / 0.009% |
| 1957 | 169 / #769 / 0.008% |
| 1956 | 168 / #751 / 0.008% |
| 1955 | 178 / #709 / 0.009% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 194 / #667 / 0.010% |
| 1953 | 203 / #625 / 0.011% |
| 1952 | 215 / #595 / 0.012% |
| 1951 | 224 / #574 / 0.012% |
| 1950 | 208 / #583 / 0.012% |
| 1949 | 214 / #574 / 0.013% |
| 1948 | 220 / #561 / 0.013% |
| 1947 | 249 / #532 / 0.014% |
| 1946 | 277 / #473 / 0.018% |
| 1945 | 241 / #462 / 0.018% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 256 / #455 / 0.019% |
| 1943 | 287 / #437 / 0.021% |
| 1942 | 292 / #423 / 0.022% |
| 1941 | 305 / #394 / 0.025% |
| 1940 | 368 / #333 / 0.032% |
| 1939 | 366 / #327 / 0.033% |
| 1938 | 357 / #336 / 0.032% |
| 1937 | 322 / #359 / 0.030% |
| 1936 | 370 / #319 / 0.036% |
| 1935 | 287 / #374 / 0.027% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 271 / #395 / 0.026% |
| 1933 | 286 / #382 / 0.028% |
| 1932 | 268 / #399 / 0.025% |
| 1931 | 274 / #395 / 0.026% |
| 1930 | 318 / #385 / 0.028% |
| 1929 | 338 / #359 / 0.030% |
| 1928 | 419 / #326 / 0.036% |
| 1927 | 436 / #321 / 0.037% |
| 1926 | 381 / #342 / 0.032% |
| 1925 | 442 / #319 / 0.036% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 479 / #305 / 0.038% |
| 1923 | 455 / #303 / 0.038% |
| 1922 | 463 / #298 / 0.039% |
| 1921 | 541 / #285 / 0.044% |
| 1920 | 483 / #296 / 0.040% |
| 1919 | 515 / #282 / 0.046% |
| 1918 | 460 / #299 / 0.040% |
| 1917 | 288 / #373 / 0.027% |
| 1916 | 287 / #362 / 0.027% |
| 1915 | 269 / #365 / 0.027% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 206 / #370 / 0.027% |
| 1913 | 165 / #377 / 0.026% |
| 1912 | 117 / #437 / 0.021% |
| 1911 | 96 / #412 / 0.023% |
| 1910 | 106 / #384 / 0.027% |
| 1909 | 81 / #407 / 0.023% |
| 1908 | 76 / #416 / 0.023% |
| 1907 | 55 / #484 / 0.017% |
| 1906 | 84 / #374 / 0.028% |
| 1905 | 60 / #437 / 0.021% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 58 / #426 / 0.021% |
| 1903 | 54 / #434 / 0.021% |
| 1902 | 56 / #414 / 0.021% |
| 1901 | 52 / #419 / 0.022% |
| 1900 | 64 / #422 / 0.021% |
| 1899 | 51 / #412 / 0.022% |
| 1898 | 39 / #500 / 0.015% |
| 1897 | 37 / #476 / 0.016% |
| 1896 | 31 / #548 / 0.013% |
| 1895 | 29 / #562 / 0.012% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 22 / #640 / 0.010% |
| 1893 | 18 / #708 / 0.008% |
| 1892 | 18 / #703 / 0.008% |
| 1891 | 25 / #521 / 0.013% |
| 1890 | 10 / #932 / 0.005% |
| 1889 | 14 / #719 / 0.008% |
| 1888 | 16 / #660 / 0.009% |
| 1887 | 9 / #849 / 0.006% |
| 1886 | 9 / #821 / 0.006% |
| 1885 | 10 / #738 / 0.008% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 7 / #918 / 0.005% |
| 1883 | 5 / #1038 / 0.004% |
| 1882 | 11 / #595 / 0.010% |
| 1881 | 6 / #815 / 0.007% |