Total babies named Tim (all years): 83,515
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 54 / #2514 / 0.003% |
| 2023 | 37 / #3282 / 0.002% |
| 2022 | 32 / #3604 / 0.002% |
| 2021 | 42 / #2968 / 0.002% |
| 2020 | 32 / #3482 / 0.002% |
| 2019 | 57 / #2389 / 0.003% |
| 2018 | 57 / #2352 / 0.003% |
| 2017 | 53 / #2444 / 0.003% |
| 2016 | 68 / #2083 / 0.004% |
| 2015 | 61 / #2228 / 0.003% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 75 / #1942 / 0.004% |
| 2013 | 51 / #2455 / 0.003% |
| 2012 | 41 / #2901 / 0.002% |
| 2011 | 48 / #2585 / 0.003% |
| 2010 | 65 / #2094 / 0.003% |
| 2009 | 69 / #2031 / 0.003% |
| 2008 | 70 / #2026 / 0.003% |
| 2007 | 77 / #1873 / 0.004% |
| 2006 | 78 / #1786 / 0.004% |
| 2005 | 84 / #1633 / 0.004% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 60 / #2019 / 0.003% |
| 2003 | 88 / #1491 / 0.004% |
| 2002 | 79 / #1569 / 0.004% |
| 2001 | 81 / #1513 / 0.004% |
| 2000 | 91 / #1388 / 0.005% |
| 1999 | 74 / #1529 / 0.004% |
| 1998 | 61 / #1696 / 0.003% |
| 1997 | 57 / #1728 / 0.003% |
| 1996 | 61 / #1613 / 0.003% |
| 1995 | 51 / #1753 / 0.003% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 69 / #1418 / 0.004% |
| 1993 | 64 / #1471 / 0.003% |
| 1992 | 78 / #1288 / 0.004% |
| 1991 | 68 / #1381 / 0.003% |
| 1990 | 77 / #1268 / 0.004% |
| 1989 | 96 / #1071 / 0.005% |
| 1988 | 92 / #1031 / 0.005% |
| 1987 | 83 / #1053 / 0.004% |
| 1986 | 75 / #1086 / 0.004% |
| 1985 | 101 / #905 / 0.005% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 122 / #792 / 0.007% |
| 1983 | 97 / #895 / 0.005% |
| 1982 | 139 / #749 / 0.008% |
| 1981 | 162 / #681 / 0.009% |
| 1980 | 165 / #677 / 0.009% |
| 1979 | 148 / #707 / 0.009% |
| 1978 | 246 / #526 / 0.015% |
| 1977 | 254 / #521 / 0.015% |
| 1976 | 291 / #460 / 0.019% |
| 1975 | 327 / #436 / 0.021% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 410 / #382 / 0.026% |
| 1973 | 523 / #328 / 0.034% |
| 1972 | 733 / #266 / 0.045% |
| 1971 | 1,049 / #226 / 0.059% |
| 1970 | 1,323 / #199 / 0.071% |
| 1969 | 1,545 / #181 / 0.086% |
| 1968 | 2,073 / #139 / 0.119% |
| 1967 | 2,624 / #116 / 0.150% |
| 1966 | 3,141 / #103 / 0.176% |
| 1965 | 3,718 / #97 / 0.200% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 4,696 / #82 / 0.236% |
| 1963 | 5,017 / #79 / 0.247% |
| 1962 | 5,586 / #71 / 0.270% |
| 1961 | 6,249 / #65 / 0.294% |
| 1960 | 6,931 / #60 / 0.325% |
| 1959 | 6,828 / #60 / 0.320% |
| 1958 | 5,536 / #74 / 0.261% |
| 1957 | 3,251 / #120 / 0.151% |
| 1956 | 1,718 / #174 / 0.081% |
| 1955 | 1,143 / #212 / 0.055% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 815 / #244 / 0.040% |
| 1953 | 744 / #254 / 0.038% |
| 1952 | 696 / #260 / 0.036% |
| 1951 | 715 / #250 / 0.038% |
| 1950 | 754 / #242 / 0.042% |
| 1949 | 1,007 / #201 / 0.057% |
| 1948 | 1,296 / #171 / 0.074% |
| 1947 | 1,330 / #170 / 0.073% |
| 1946 | 1,134 / #171 / 0.070% |
| 1945 | 779 / #192 / 0.058% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 605 / #229 / 0.044% |
| 1943 | 618 / #233 / 0.043% |
| 1942 | 512 / #264 / 0.037% |
| 1941 | 388 / #296 / 0.032% |
| 1940 | 333 / #308 / 0.029% |
| 1939 | 245 / #362 / 0.022% |
| 1938 | 270 / #337 / 0.024% |
| 1937 | 162 / #441 / 0.015% |
| 1936 | 134 / #490 / 0.013% |
| 1935 | 131 / #500 / 0.013% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 114 / #554 / 0.011% |
| 1933 | 101 / #576 / 0.010% |
| 1932 | 87 / #656 / 0.008% |
| 1931 | 72 / #727 / 0.007% |
| 1930 | 61 / #839 / 0.006% |
| 1929 | 74 / #732 / 0.007% |
| 1928 | 50 / #977 / 0.005% |
| 1927 | 64 / #847 / 0.006% |
| 1926 | 65 / #824 / 0.006% |
| 1925 | 60 / #868 / 0.005% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 62 / #884 / 0.005% |
| 1923 | 65 / #844 / 0.006% |
| 1922 | 49 / #1019 / 0.005% |
| 1921 | 54 / #961 / 0.005% |
| 1920 | 64 / #851 / 0.006% |
| 1919 | 57 / #887 / 0.006% |
| 1918 | 67 / #802 / 0.007% |
| 1917 | 48 / #931 / 0.005% |
| 1916 | 56 / #838 / 0.006% |
| 1915 | 40 / #1014 / 0.005% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 55 / #696 / 0.008% |
| 1913 | 37 / #788 / 0.007% |
| 1912 | 36 / #723 / 0.008% |
| 1911 | 23 / #665 / 0.010% |
| 1910 | 34 / #478 / 0.018% |
| 1909 | 30 / #472 / 0.018% |
| 1908 | 21 / #564 / 0.014% |
| 1907 | 19 / #586 / 0.013% |
| 1906 | 15 / #639 / 0.011% |
| 1905 | 19 / #546 / 0.014% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 14 / #642 / 0.011% |
| 1903 | 25 / #398 / 0.021% |
| 1902 | 18 / #520 / 0.015% |
| 1901 | 8 / #852 / 0.008% |
| 1900 | 22 / #516 / 0.015% |
| 1899 | 13 / #577 / 0.012% |
| 1898 | 12 / #659 / 0.010% |
| 1897 | 7 / #935 / 0.006% |
| 1896 | 14 / #587 / 0.012% |
| 1895 | 15 / #554 / 0.013% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 8 / #849 / 0.007% |
| 1893 | 19 / #431 / 0.017% |
| 1892 | 12 / #636 / 0.010% |
| 1891 | 15 / #473 / 0.015% |
| 1890 | 17 / #455 / 0.015% |
| 1889 | 14 / #521 / 0.013% |
| 1888 | 10 / #697 / 0.008% |
| 1887 | 18 / #406 / 0.018% |
| 1886 | 14 / #508 / 0.013% |
| 1885 | 16 / #477 / 0.015% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 16 / #485 / 0.014% |
| 1883 | 16 / #457 / 0.015% |
| 1882 | 11 / #607 / 0.010% |
| 1881 | 12 / #531 / 0.012% |
| 1880 | 12 / #563 / 0.011% |