Total babies named Ursula (all years): 14,782
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 25 / #5266 / 0.002% |
| 2023 | 39 / #3902 / 0.002% |
| 2022 | 25 / #5291 / 0.002% |
| 2021 | 34 / #4234 / 0.002% |
| 2020 | 28 / #4745 / 0.002% |
| 2019 | 23 / #5599 / 0.001% |
| 2018 | 29 / #4762 / 0.002% |
| 2017 | 33 / #4375 / 0.002% |
| 2016 | 30 / #4726 / 0.002% |
| 2015 | 41 / #3754 / 0.002% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 24 / #5619 / 0.001% |
| 2013 | 30 / #4742 / 0.002% |
| 2012 | 27 / #5245 / 0.002% |
| 2011 | 26 / #5348 / 0.001% |
| 2010 | 32 / #4600 / 0.002% |
| 2009 | 39 / #4009 / 0.002% |
| 2008 | 24 / #5943 / 0.001% |
| 2007 | 38 / #4124 / 0.002% |
| 2006 | 30 / #4800 / 0.002% |
| 2005 | 26 / #5105 / 0.001% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 34 / #4166 / 0.002% |
| 2003 | 47 / #3184 / 0.003% |
| 2002 | 31 / #4175 / 0.002% |
| 2001 | 44 / #3193 / 0.002% |
| 2000 | 44 / #3164 / 0.002% |
| 1999 | 52 / #2699 / 0.003% |
| 1998 | 66 / #2187 / 0.004% |
| 1997 | 39 / #3099 / 0.002% |
| 1996 | 37 / #3233 / 0.002% |
| 1995 | 49 / #2586 / 0.003% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 62 / #2187 / 0.003% |
| 1993 | 47 / #2636 / 0.003% |
| 1992 | 62 / #2188 / 0.003% |
| 1991 | 80 / #1806 / 0.004% |
| 1990 | 97 / #1576 / 0.005% |
| 1989 | 106 / #1412 / 0.006% |
| 1988 | 128 / #1186 / 0.007% |
| 1987 | 130 / #1144 / 0.007% |
| 1986 | 127 / #1140 / 0.007% |
| 1985 | 131 / #1107 / 0.008% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 132 / #1066 / 0.008% |
| 1983 | 148 / #987 / 0.009% |
| 1982 | 160 / #937 / 0.009% |
| 1981 | 170 / #890 / 0.010% |
| 1980 | 166 / #912 / 0.010% |
| 1979 | 181 / #861 / 0.011% |
| 1978 | 179 / #834 / 0.012% |
| 1977 | 217 / #716 / 0.014% |
| 1976 | 230 / #668 / 0.016% |
| 1975 | 261 / #609 / 0.018% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 268 / #592 / 0.018% |
| 1973 | 297 / #554 / 0.020% |
| 1972 | 377 / #477 / 0.025% |
| 1971 | 395 / #488 / 0.024% |
| 1970 | 335 / #555 / 0.019% |
| 1969 | 384 / #497 / 0.023% |
| 1968 | 354 / #514 / 0.022% |
| 1967 | 400 / #474 / 0.024% |
| 1966 | 368 / #488 / 0.022% |
| 1965 | 355 / #505 / 0.020% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 236 / #666 / 0.012% |
| 1963 | 203 / #719 / 0.011% |
| 1962 | 194 / #741 / 0.010% |
| 1961 | 182 / #780 / 0.009% |
| 1960 | 134 / #918 / 0.007% |
| 1959 | 119 / #969 / 0.006% |
| 1958 | 121 / #940 / 0.006% |
| 1957 | 109 / #1001 / 0.005% |
| 1956 | 134 / #867 / 0.007% |
| 1955 | 144 / #808 / 0.007% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 119 / #882 / 0.006% |
| 1953 | 89 / #1025 / 0.005% |
| 1952 | 93 / #981 / 0.005% |
| 1951 | 82 / #1030 / 0.005% |
| 1950 | 77 / #1052 / 0.004% |
| 1949 | 68 / #1103 / 0.004% |
| 1948 | 65 / #1115 / 0.004% |
| 1947 | 87 / #957 / 0.005% |
| 1946 | 72 / #996 / 0.005% |
| 1945 | 78 / #855 / 0.006% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 85 / #832 / 0.006% |
| 1943 | 71 / #934 / 0.005% |
| 1942 | 83 / #843 / 0.006% |
| 1941 | 90 / #755 / 0.007% |
| 1940 | 86 / #751 / 0.008% |
| 1939 | 108 / #654 / 0.010% |
| 1938 | 104 / #677 / 0.009% |
| 1937 | 100 / #682 / 0.009% |
| 1936 | 114 / #619 / 0.011% |
| 1935 | 115 / #610 / 0.011% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 107 / #651 / 0.010% |
| 1933 | 132 / #557 / 0.013% |
| 1932 | 101 / #674 / 0.009% |
| 1931 | 104 / #652 / 0.010% |
| 1930 | 141 / #578 / 0.013% |
| 1929 | 127 / #608 / 0.011% |
| 1928 | 122 / #641 / 0.011% |
| 1927 | 131 / #626 / 0.011% |
| 1926 | 122 / #654 / 0.010% |
| 1925 | 144 / #608 / 0.012% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 152 / #609 / 0.012% |
| 1923 | 181 / #527 / 0.015% |
| 1922 | 159 / #571 / 0.013% |
| 1921 | 143 / #611 / 0.012% |
| 1920 | 160 / #567 / 0.013% |
| 1919 | 142 / #592 / 0.013% |
| 1918 | 155 / #573 / 0.013% |
| 1917 | 135 / #589 / 0.012% |
| 1916 | 147 / #550 / 0.014% |
| 1915 | 144 / #525 / 0.015% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 119 / #514 / 0.016% |
| 1913 | 99 / #511 / 0.016% |
| 1912 | 79 / #552 / 0.014% |
| 1911 | 66 / #514 / 0.016% |
| 1910 | 55 / #559 / 0.014% |
| 1909 | 61 / #482 / 0.018% |
| 1908 | 48 / #534 / 0.014% |
| 1907 | 42 / #571 / 0.013% |
| 1906 | 55 / #462 / 0.019% |
| 1905 | 50 / #484 / 0.017% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 37 / #557 / 0.013% |
| 1903 | 46 / #477 / 0.018% |
| 1902 | 35 / #558 / 0.013% |
| 1901 | 45 / #447 / 0.019% |
| 1900 | 41 / #530 / 0.014% |
| 1899 | 29 / #576 / 0.012% |
| 1898 | 40 / #490 / 0.015% |
| 1897 | 32 / #528 / 0.014% |
| 1896 | 31 / #549 / 0.013% |
| 1895 | 39 / #470 / 0.017% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 22 / #641 / 0.010% |
| 1893 | 18 / #710 / 0.008% |
| 1892 | 21 / #635 / 0.010% |
| 1891 | 21 / #587 / 0.011% |
| 1890 | 26 / #523 / 0.014% |
| 1889 | 18 / #619 / 0.010% |
| 1888 | 14 / #723 / 0.008% |
| 1887 | 20 / #510 / 0.014% |
| 1886 | 19 / #527 / 0.013% |
| 1885 | 19 / #499 / 0.014% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 9 / #785 / 0.007% |
| 1883 | 7 / #814 / 0.006% |
| 1882 | 9 / #672 / 0.008% |
| 1881 | 6 / #821 / 0.007% |