Total babies named Virgil (all years): 73,325
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 114 / #1542 / 0.007% |
| 2023 | 123 / #1471 / 0.007% |
| 2022 | 81 / #1935 / 0.005% |
| 2021 | 101 / #1653 / 0.006% |
| 2020 | 85 / #1787 / 0.005% |
| 2019 | 91 / #1734 / 0.005% |
| 2018 | 73 / #2014 / 0.004% |
| 2017 | 96 / #1660 / 0.005% |
| 2016 | 88 / #1761 / 0.005% |
| 2015 | 70 / #2052 / 0.004% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 75 / #1943 / 0.004% |
| 2013 | 68 / #2018 / 0.004% |
| 2012 | 50 / #2516 / 0.003% |
| 2011 | 73 / #1925 / 0.004% |
| 2010 | 80 / #1830 / 0.004% |
| 2009 | 64 / #2141 / 0.003% |
| 2008 | 54 / #2404 / 0.003% |
| 2007 | 73 / #1948 / 0.004% |
| 2006 | 69 / #1966 / 0.003% |
| 2005 | 69 / #1868 / 0.003% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 75 / #1714 / 0.004% |
| 2003 | 69 / #1761 / 0.003% |
| 2002 | 71 / #1680 / 0.004% |
| 2001 | 75 / #1599 / 0.004% |
| 2000 | 66 / #1723 / 0.003% |
| 1999 | 80 / #1456 / 0.004% |
| 1998 | 102 / #1215 / 0.005% |
| 1997 | 82 / #1365 / 0.004% |
| 1996 | 88 / #1264 / 0.005% |
| 1995 | 96 / #1186 / 0.005% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 85 / #1274 / 0.004% |
| 1993 | 114 / #1037 / 0.006% |
| 1992 | 112 / #1036 / 0.006% |
| 1991 | 149 / #861 / 0.007% |
| 1990 | 159 / #807 / 0.008% |
| 1989 | 146 / #824 / 0.007% |
| 1988 | 142 / #797 / 0.007% |
| 1987 | 142 / #776 / 0.008% |
| 1986 | 179 / #671 / 0.010% |
| 1985 | 147 / #730 / 0.008% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 180 / #642 / 0.010% |
| 1983 | 160 / #678 / 0.009% |
| 1982 | 227 / #570 / 0.013% |
| 1981 | 220 / #577 / 0.012% |
| 1980 | 203 / #617 / 0.011% |
| 1979 | 238 / #557 / 0.014% |
| 1978 | 228 / #552 / 0.014% |
| 1977 | 253 / #524 / 0.015% |
| 1976 | 265 / #488 / 0.017% |
| 1975 | 311 / #452 / 0.020% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 312 / #452 / 0.020% |
| 1973 | 345 / #422 / 0.022% |
| 1972 | 366 / #415 / 0.023% |
| 1971 | 421 / #392 / 0.024% |
| 1970 | 408 / #397 / 0.022% |
| 1969 | 384 / #406 / 0.021% |
| 1968 | 442 / #371 / 0.025% |
| 1967 | 446 / #354 / 0.026% |
| 1966 | 458 / #350 / 0.026% |
| 1965 | 503 / #338 / 0.027% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 547 / #335 / 0.027% |
| 1963 | 561 / #332 / 0.028% |
| 1962 | 555 / #334 / 0.027% |
| 1961 | 625 / #314 / 0.029% |
| 1960 | 687 / #296 / 0.032% |
| 1959 | 652 / #304 / 0.031% |
| 1958 | 696 / #290 / 0.033% |
| 1957 | 668 / #286 / 0.031% |
| 1956 | 709 / #277 / 0.034% |
| 1955 | 699 / #268 / 0.034% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 743 / #261 / 0.036% |
| 1953 | 759 / #249 / 0.038% |
| 1952 | 786 / #237 / 0.040% |
| 1951 | 789 / #242 / 0.042% |
| 1950 | 786 / #234 / 0.044% |
| 1949 | 791 / #228 / 0.045% |
| 1948 | 794 / #230 / 0.045% |
| 1947 | 854 / #219 / 0.047% |
| 1946 | 881 / #198 / 0.054% |
| 1945 | 845 / #183 / 0.063% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 928 / #177 / 0.068% |
| 1943 | 993 / #175 / 0.070% |
| 1942 | 1,003 / #168 / 0.073% |
| 1941 | 923 / #170 / 0.075% |
| 1940 | 938 / #166 / 0.081% |
| 1939 | 937 / #164 / 0.085% |
| 1938 | 1,068 / #151 / 0.096% |
| 1937 | 970 / #157 / 0.091% |
| 1936 | 1,034 / #149 / 0.100% |
| 1935 | 1,104 / #141 / 0.106% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 1,128 / #141 / 0.109% |
| 1933 | 1,139 / #138 / 0.115% |
| 1932 | 1,228 / #139 / 0.118% |
| 1931 | 1,384 / #121 / 0.133% |
| 1930 | 1,371 / #128 / 0.125% |
| 1929 | 1,339 / #127 / 0.124% |
| 1928 | 1,405 / #126 / 0.127% |
| 1927 | 1,498 / #121 / 0.133% |
| 1926 | 1,576 / #118 / 0.142% |
| 1925 | 1,503 / #120 / 0.135% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 1,627 / #111 / 0.144% |
| 1923 | 1,713 / #100 / 0.156% |
| 1922 | 1,790 / #99 / 0.165% |
| 1921 | 1,830 / #98 / 0.166% |
| 1920 | 1,711 / #101 / 0.161% |
| 1919 | 1,570 / #103 / 0.160% |
| 1918 | 1,707 / #99 / 0.168% |
| 1917 | 1,523 / #103 / 0.165% |
| 1916 | 1,496 / #104 / 0.168% |
| 1915 | 1,376 / #108 / 0.162% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 1,048 / #107 / 0.160% |
| 1913 | 819 / #107 / 0.160% |
| 1912 | 684 / #111 / 0.159% |
| 1911 | 355 / #107 / 0.157% |
| 1910 | 280 / #111 / 0.144% |
| 1909 | 250 / #110 / 0.152% |
| 1908 | 258 / #100 / 0.167% |
| 1907 | 276 / #93 / 0.188% |
| 1906 | 207 / #103 / 0.155% |
| 1905 | 226 / #97 / 0.171% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 211 / #100 / 0.165% |
| 1903 | 173 / #113 / 0.145% |
| 1902 | 163 / #119 / 0.133% |
| 1901 | 158 / #110 / 0.148% |
| 1900 | 212 / #111 / 0.141% |
| 1899 | 154 / #111 / 0.145% |
| 1898 | 155 / #120 / 0.126% |
| 1897 | 159 / #110 / 0.141% |
| 1896 | 138 / #126 / 0.115% |
| 1895 | 146 / #116 / 0.124% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 125 / #130 / 0.108% |
| 1893 | 119 / #127 / 0.106% |
| 1892 | 130 / #129 / 0.107% |
| 1891 | 123 / #114 / 0.122% |
| 1890 | 100 / #142 / 0.090% |
| 1889 | 93 / #154 / 0.084% |
| 1888 | 112 / #137 / 0.093% |
| 1887 | 77 / #165 / 0.076% |
| 1886 | 79 / #175 / 0.071% |
| 1885 | 82 / #165 / 0.076% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 88 / #160 / 0.077% |
| 1883 | 70 / #176 / 0.067% |
| 1882 | 80 / #171 / 0.070% |
| 1881 | 65 / #182 / 0.065% |
| 1880 | 81 / #164 / 0.073% |