Total babies named Rudolph (all years): 53,610
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 34 / #3436 / 0.002% |
| 2023 | 22 / #4713 / 0.001% |
| 2022 | 30 / #3754 / 0.002% |
| 2021 | 31 / #3633 / 0.002% |
| 2020 | 28 / #3790 / 0.002% |
| 2019 | 41 / #2984 / 0.002% |
| 2018 | 34 / #3357 / 0.002% |
| 2017 | 40 / #2996 / 0.002% |
| 2016 | 34 / #3350 / 0.002% |
| 2015 | 41 / #2907 / 0.002% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 47 / #2614 / 0.002% |
| 2013 | 36 / #3111 / 0.002% |
| 2012 | 43 / #2806 / 0.002% |
| 2011 | 44 / #2731 / 0.002% |
| 2010 | 32 / #3432 / 0.002% |
| 2009 | 35 / #3262 / 0.002% |
| 2008 | 54 / #2401 / 0.003% |
| 2007 | 45 / #2711 / 0.002% |
| 2006 | 50 / #2469 / 0.002% |
| 2005 | 58 / #2125 / 0.003% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 59 / #2047 / 0.003% |
| 2003 | 65 / #1838 / 0.003% |
| 2002 | 69 / #1706 / 0.004% |
| 2001 | 82 / #1499 / 0.004% |
| 2000 | 72 / #1638 / 0.004% |
| 1999 | 63 / #1685 / 0.003% |
| 1998 | 92 / #1300 / 0.005% |
| 1997 | 76 / #1437 / 0.004% |
| 1996 | 109 / #1105 / 0.006% |
| 1995 | 105 / #1120 / 0.006% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 105 / #1103 / 0.005% |
| 1993 | 108 / #1077 / 0.006% |
| 1992 | 119 / #994 / 0.006% |
| 1991 | 131 / #928 / 0.006% |
| 1990 | 146 / #848 / 0.007% |
| 1989 | 183 / #732 / 0.009% |
| 1988 | 170 / #723 / 0.009% |
| 1987 | 156 / #731 / 0.008% |
| 1986 | 139 / #770 / 0.008% |
| 1985 | 157 / #705 / 0.008% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 165 / #676 / 0.009% |
| 1983 | 175 / #647 / 0.010% |
| 1982 | 192 / #626 / 0.011% |
| 1981 | 170 / #660 / 0.009% |
| 1980 | 196 / #625 / 0.011% |
| 1979 | 190 / #623 / 0.011% |
| 1978 | 182 / #621 / 0.011% |
| 1977 | 181 / #624 / 0.011% |
| 1976 | 198 / #580 / 0.013% |
| 1975 | 188 / #588 / 0.012% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 217 / #546 / 0.014% |
| 1973 | 215 / #536 / 0.014% |
| 1972 | 231 / #518 / 0.014% |
| 1971 | 275 / #485 / 0.016% |
| 1970 | 309 / #462 / 0.017% |
| 1969 | 251 / #485 / 0.014% |
| 1968 | 270 / #464 / 0.016% |
| 1967 | 276 / #452 / 0.016% |
| 1966 | 352 / #403 / 0.020% |
| 1965 | 328 / #426 / 0.018% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 378 / #415 / 0.019% |
| 1963 | 412 / #395 / 0.020% |
| 1962 | 412 / #400 / 0.020% |
| 1961 | 414 / #393 / 0.019% |
| 1960 | 442 / #376 / 0.021% |
| 1959 | 458 / #366 / 0.021% |
| 1958 | 486 / #347 / 0.023% |
| 1957 | 572 / #319 / 0.027% |
| 1956 | 719 / #274 / 0.034% |
| 1955 | 653 / #281 / 0.032% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 653 / #276 / 0.032% |
| 1953 | 745 / #253 / 0.038% |
| 1952 | 777 / #240 / 0.040% |
| 1951 | 831 / #228 / 0.044% |
| 1950 | 756 / #239 / 0.042% |
| 1949 | 822 / #223 / 0.046% |
| 1948 | 716 / #241 / 0.041% |
| 1947 | 696 / #249 / 0.038% |
| 1946 | 628 / #246 / 0.039% |
| 1945 | 574 / #235 / 0.043% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 573 / #235 / 0.042% |
| 1943 | 664 / #221 / 0.047% |
| 1942 | 658 / #222 / 0.048% |
| 1941 | 600 / #220 / 0.049% |
| 1940 | 622 / #206 / 0.054% |
| 1939 | 587 / #208 / 0.053% |
| 1938 | 684 / #192 / 0.062% |
| 1937 | 630 / #197 / 0.059% |
| 1936 | 647 / #192 / 0.062% |
| 1935 | 745 / #181 / 0.072% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 779 / #175 / 0.075% |
| 1933 | 847 / #167 / 0.085% |
| 1932 | 960 / #158 / 0.092% |
| 1931 | 1,101 / #146 / 0.106% |
| 1930 | 1,219 / #140 / 0.111% |
| 1929 | 1,220 / #140 / 0.113% |
| 1928 | 1,308 / #134 / 0.118% |
| 1927 | 1,690 / #110 / 0.150% |
| 1926 | 1,636 / #111 / 0.147% |
| 1925 | 1,240 / #136 / 0.111% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 1,229 / #138 / 0.109% |
| 1923 | 1,303 / #128 / 0.119% |
| 1922 | 1,145 / #138 / 0.105% |
| 1921 | 960 / #157 / 0.087% |
| 1920 | 830 / #169 / 0.078% |
| 1919 | 802 / #170 / 0.082% |
| 1918 | 962 / #149 / 0.095% |
| 1917 | 946 / #141 / 0.102% |
| 1916 | 988 / #137 / 0.111% |
| 1915 | 974 / #135 / 0.115% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 732 / #139 / 0.112% |
| 1913 | 565 / #139 / 0.110% |
| 1912 | 453 / #141 / 0.105% |
| 1911 | 217 / #155 / 0.096% |
| 1910 | 218 / #147 / 0.112% |
| 1909 | 173 / #148 / 0.105% |
| 1908 | 173 / #140 / 0.112% |
| 1907 | 135 / #162 / 0.092% |
| 1906 | 125 / #158 / 0.094% |
| 1905 | 132 / #156 / 0.100% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 128 / #150 / 0.100% |
| 1903 | 120 / #153 / 0.101% |
| 1902 | 119 / #151 / 0.097% |
| 1901 | 87 / #172 / 0.082% |
| 1900 | 147 / #145 / 0.098% |
| 1899 | 100 / #153 / 0.094% |
| 1898 | 115 / #147 / 0.094% |
| 1897 | 109 / #147 / 0.097% |
| 1896 | 108 / #154 / 0.090% |
| 1895 | 106 / #147 / 0.090% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 104 / #148 / 0.090% |
| 1893 | 101 / #149 / 0.090% |
| 1892 | 95 / #169 / 0.078% |
| 1891 | 68 / #187 / 0.067% |
| 1890 | 92 / #154 / 0.083% |
| 1889 | 83 / #165 / 0.075% |
| 1888 | 54 / #238 / 0.045% |
| 1887 | 71 / #178 / 0.070% |
| 1886 | 68 / #198 / 0.061% |
| 1885 | 70 / #189 / 0.065% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 77 / #182 / 0.067% |
| 1883 | 61 / #196 / 0.058% |
| 1882 | 52 / #230 / 0.046% |
| 1881 | 62 / #186 / 0.062% |
| 1880 | 54 / #218 / 0.049% |